Doping evolution of charge and spin excitations in two-leg Hubbard ladders: comparing DMRG and RPA+FLEX results
A. Nocera, Y. Wang, N. D. Patel, G. Alvarez, T. A. Maier, E. Dagotto, S. Johnston
arXiv:1803.08597 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.195156 · 2018-03-22 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the magnetic and charge dynamical response of a Hubbard model in a two-leg ladder geometry using the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) method and the random phase approximation within the fluctuation-exchange approximation (RPA+FLEX). Our calculations reveal that RPA+FLEX can capture the main features of the magnetic response from weak up to intermediate Hubbard repulsion for doped ladders, when compared with the numerically exact DMRG results. However, while at weak Hubbard repulsion both the spin and charge spectra can be understood in terms of weakly-interacting electron-hole excitations across the Fermi surface, at intermediate coupling DMRG shows gapped spin excitations at large momentum transfer that remain gapless within the RPA+FLEX approximation. For the charge response, RPA+FLEX can only reproduce the main features of the DMRG spectra at weak coupling and high doping levels, while it shows an incoherent character away from this limit. Overall, our analysis shows that RPA+FLEX works surprisingly well for spin excitations at weak and intermediate Hubbard $U$ values even in the difficult low-dimensional geometry such as a two-leg ladder. Finally, we discuss the implications of our results for neutron scattering and resonant inelastic x-ray scattering experiments on two-leg ladder cuprate compounds.
Similar papers
Beyond-Hubbard pairing in a cuprate ladder
similarity 0.91Hari Padma et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2501.10287
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Concepts in High Temperature Superconductivity
similarity 0.89E. W. Carlson et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0206217
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A DMRG study: Pair-density wave in spin-valley locked systems
similarity 0.88Jordan Venderley & Eun-Ah Kim · 2017 · arXiv:1709.10058
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
FLEX+DMFT approach to the -wave superconducting phase diagram of the two-dimensional Hubbard model
similarity 0.88Motoharu Kitatani et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1505.04865
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for spin-triplet odd-parity superconductivity close to type-II van Hove singularities
similarity 0.88Zi Yang Meng et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1408.1407
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum Monte Carlo and exact diagonalization study of a dynamic Hubbard model
similarity 0.88J. E. Hirsch · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0201005
Source status unknown — claims are unverified