Tracking the nematicity in cuprate superconductors: a resistivity study under uniaxial pressure
Tao Xie, Zhaoyu Liu, Yanhong Gu, Dongliang Gong, Huican Mao, Jing Liu, Cheng Hu, Xiaoyan Ma, Yuan Yao, Lin Zhao, Xingjiang Zhou, John Schneeloch, Genda Gu, Sergey Danilkin, Yi-feng Yang, Huiqian Luo, Shiliang Li
arXiv:1805.00666 · DOI 10.1088/1361-648X/ac768c · 2018-05-02 · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Overshadowing the superconducting dome in hole-doped cuprates, the pseudogap state is still one of the mysteries that no consensus can be achieved. It has been suggested that the rotational symmetry is broken in this state and may result in a nematic phase transition, whose temperature seems to coincide with the onset temperature of the pseudogap state $T^*$ around optimal doping level, raising the question whether the pseudogap results from the establishment of the nematic order. Here we report results of resistivity measurements under uniaxial pressure on several hole-doped cuprates, where the normalized slope of the elastoresistivity $ζ$ can be obtained as illustrated in iron-based superconductors. The temperature dependence of $ζ$ along particular lattice axis exhibits kink feature at $T_{k}$ and shows Curie-Weiss-like behavior above it, which may suggest a spontaneous nematic transition. While $T_{k}$ seems to be the same as $T^*$ around the optimal doping and in the overdoped region, they become very different in underdoped La$_{2-x}$Sr$_{x}$CuO$_4$. Our results suggest that the nematic order, if indeed existing, is an electronic phase within the pseudogap state.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 37 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 37 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 36.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Enhancement of superconductivity by electronic nematicity in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.91Zhangkai Cao et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2105.14494
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Divergent nematic susceptibility near the pseudogap critical point in a cuprate superconductor
similarity 0.90K. Ishida et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1908.07167
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nematicity in the pseudogap state of cuprate superconductors revealed by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy
similarity 0.90S. Nakata et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1811.10028
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Diagonal Nematicity in the Pseudogap Phase of HgBaCuO
similarity 0.90H. Murayama et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1805.00276
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two types of nematicity in the phase diagram of the cuprate superconductor YBaCuO
similarity 0.90O. Cyr-Choinière et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1504.06972
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudogap temperature of cuprate superconductors from the Nernst effect
similarity 0.89O. Cyr-Choinière et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1703.06927
Source status unknown — claims are unverified