A Tale of Two Metals: contrasting criticalities in the pnictides and hole-doped cuprates
N. E. Hussey, J. Buhot, S. Licciardello
arXiv:1805.03866 · DOI 10.1088/1361-6633/aaa97c · 2018-05-10 · Reports on Progress in Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The iron-based high temperature superconductors share a number of similarities with their copper-based counterparts, such as reduced dimensionality, proximity to states of competing order, and a critical role for 3d electron orbitals. Their respective temperature-doping phase diagrams also contain certain commonalities that have led to claims that the metallic and superconducting properties of both families are governed by their proximity to a quantum critical point (QCP) located inside the superconducting dome. In this review, we critically examine these claims and highlight significant differences in the bulk physical properties of both systems. While there is now a large body of evidence supporting the presence of a (magnetic) QCP in the iron pnictides, the situation in the cuprates is much less apparent, at least for the end point of the pseudogap phase. We argue that the opening of the normal state pseudogap in cuprates, so often tied to a putative QCP, arises from a momentum-dependent breakdown of quasiparticle coherence that sets in at much higher doping levels but which is driven by the proximity to the Mott insulating state at half filling. Finally, we present a new scenario for the cuprates in which this loss of quasiparticle integrity and its evolution with momentum, temperature and doping plays a key role in shaping the resultant phase diagram.
Similar papers
Quantum critical point lying beneath the superconducting dome in iron-pnictides
similarity 0.92T. Shibauchi et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1304.6387
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum criticality at the end of a pseudogap phase in superconducting infinite-layer nickelates
similarity 0.92C. Iorio-Duval et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2510.12786
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Empirical case for two pseudogaps in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.92J. M. Tranquada · 2019 · arXiv:1904.10473
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermodynamic signatures of quantum criticality in cuprates
similarity 0.91B. Michon et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1804.08502
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Identification of two critical charge carrier doping values in high-temperature Y0.8Ca0.2Ba2Cu3Ox and Sm2−xCexCuO4−y cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.90B. J. Taylor et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The cuprate phase diagram and the influence of nanoscale inhomogeneities
similarity 0.90Nader Zaki et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1708.01558
Source status unknown — claims are unverified