Commensurate vs incommensurate charge ordering near the superconducting dome in Ir$_{1-x}$Pt$_x$Te$_2$ revealed by resonant x-ray scattering
K. Takubo, K. Yamamoto, Y. Hirata, H. Wadati, T. Mizokawa, R. Sutarto, F. He, K. Ishii, Y. Yamasaki, H. Nakao, Y. Murakami, G. Matsuo, H. Ishii, M. Kobayashi, K. Kudo, M. Nohara
arXiv:1805.05547 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.205142 · 2018-05-15 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The electronic-structural modulations of Ir$_{1-x}$Pt$_x$Te$_2$ (0 $\leqq x\leqq$ 0.12) have been examined by resonant elastic x-ray scattering (REXS) and resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) techniques at both the Ir and Te edges. Charge-density-wave-like superstructure with wave vectors of $\mathbf{Q}$=(1/5 0 $-$1/5), (1/8 0 $-$1/8), and (1/6 0 $-$1/6) are observed on the same sample of IrTe$_2$ at the lowest temperature, the patterns of which are controlled by the cooling speeds. In contrast, superstructures around $\mathbf{Q}$=(1/5 0 $-$1/5) are observed for doped samples (0.02 $\leqq x\leqq$ 0.05). The superstructure reflections persist to higher Pt substitution than previously assumed, demonstrating that a charge density wave (CDW) can coexists with superconductivity. The analysis of the energy-dependent REXS and RIXS lineshape reveals the importance of the Te 5$p$ state rather than the Ir 5$d$ states in the formation of the spatial modulation of these systems. The phase diagram re-examined in this work suggests that the CDW incommensurability may correlate the emergence of superconducting states as-like Cu$_x$TiSe$_2$ and Li$_x$TaS$_2$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ir0.95Pt0.05Te2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ir0.95Pt0.05Te2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Commensurate versus incommensurate charge ordering near the superconducting dome in Ir1−xPtxTe2 revealed by resonant x-ray scattering
similarity 0.92K. Takubo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence of structural transition in TM0.5IrTe2 (TM=Mn, Fe, Co, Ni)
similarity 0.89J. -Q. Yan et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1309.4829
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
From charge- and spin-ordering to superconductivity in the organic charge-transfer solids
similarity 0.89R. T. Clay & S. Mazumdar · 2018 · arXiv:1802.01551
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Competition between the structural phase transition and superconductivity in IrPtTe as revealed by pressure effects
similarity 0.89A. Kiswandhi et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1212.5330
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge-Stripe Order and Superconductivity in
similarity 0.88O. Ivashko et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1708.06537
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nodeless superconductivity in IrPtTe with strong spin-orbital coupling
similarity 0.88S. Y. Zhou et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1209.4229
Source status unknown — claims are unverified