Revisiting 2-pi phase slip suppression in topological Josephson junctions
Rosa Rodriguez-Mota, Smitha Vishveshwara, T. Pereg-Barnea
arXiv:1805.10601 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.024517 · 2018-05-27 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Current state of the art devices for detecting and manipulating Majorana fermions commonly consist of networks of Majorana wires and tunnel junctions. We study a key ingredient of these networks - a topological Josephson junction with charging energy - and pinpoint crucial features for device implementation. The phase dependent tunneling term contains both the usual 2pi-periodic Josephson term and a 4pi-periodic Majorana tunneling term representing the coupling between Majoranas on both sides of the junction. In non-topological junctions when the charging energy is small compared to the Josephson tunneling scale the low energy physics is described by 2pi phase slips. By contrast, in a topological junction, due to the 4pi periodicity of the tunneling term it is usually expected that only 4pi phase slips are possible while 2pi phase slips are suppressed. However, we find that if the ratio between the strengths of the Majorana assisted tunneling and the Josephson tunneling is small, as is likely to be the case for many setups, 2pi phase slips occur and may even dominate the low energy physics. In this limit one can view the 4pi phase slips as a pair of 2pi phase slips with arbitrarily large separation. We provide an effective descriptions of the system in terms of 2pi and 4pi phase slips valid for all values of the tunneling ratio. Comparing the spectrum of the effective models with numerical simulations we determine the cross-over between the 4pi phase slip regime to 2pi phase slip dominated regime. We also discuss the role of the charging energy as well as the implications of our results on the dissipative phase transitions expected in such a system.
Similar papers
Differentiating Majorana from Andreev Bound States in a Superconducting Circuit
similarity 0.91Konstantin Yavilberg et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1902.07229
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Signatures of Majorana Fermions in Topological Insulator Josephson Junction Devices
similarity 0.89Benjamin J. Wieder et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1302.2113
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-Channel Kondo Physics in a Majorana Island Coupled to a Josephson Junction
similarity 0.89L. Aviad Landau & Eran Sela · 2016 · arXiv:1609.09257
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Time scales for Majorana manipulation using Coulomb blockade in gate-controlled superconducting nanowires
similarity 0.89Hell, Michael et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1601.07369
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Supersymmetry in the Majorana Cooper-Pair Box
similarity 0.89Jascha Ulrich et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1405.3089
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Revisiting 2π phase slip suppression in topological Josephson junctions
similarity 0.89Rosa Rodríguez-Mota et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified