← Back to search

Observation of the signatures of sub-resolution defects in two-dimensional superconductors with scanning SQUID

Hilary Noad, Christopher A. Watson, Hisashi Inoue, Minu Kim, Hiroki K. Sato, Christopher Bell, Harold Y. Hwang, John R. Kirtley, Kathryn A. Moler

arXiv:1806.00617 · 2018-06-02

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The diamagnetic susceptibility of a superconductor is directly related to its superfluid density. Mutual inductance is a highly sensitive method for characterizing thin films; however, in traditional mutual inductance measurements, the measured response is a non-trivial average over the area of the mutual inductance coils, which are typically of millimeter size. Here we image localized, isolated features in the diamagnetic susceptibility of δ-doped SrTiO3, the 2-DES at the interface between LaAlO3 and SrTiO3, and Nb superconducting thin film systems using scanning superconducting quantum interference device susceptometry, with spatial resolution as fine as 0.7 μm. We show that these features can be modeled as locally suppressed superfluid density, with a single parameter that characterizes the strength of each feature. This method provides a systematic means of finding and quantifying submicron defects in two-dimensional superconductors.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
SrTiO3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
SrTiO3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers