Observation of the signatures of sub-resolution defects in two-dimensional superconductors with scanning SQUID
Hilary Noad, Christopher A. Watson, Hisashi Inoue, Minu Kim, Hiroki K. Sato, Christopher Bell, Harold Y. Hwang, John R. Kirtley, Kathryn A. Moler
arXiv:1806.00617 · 2018-06-02
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The diamagnetic susceptibility of a superconductor is directly related to its superfluid density. Mutual inductance is a highly sensitive method for characterizing thin films; however, in traditional mutual inductance measurements, the measured response is a non-trivial average over the area of the mutual inductance coils, which are typically of millimeter size. Here we image localized, isolated features in the diamagnetic susceptibility of δ-doped SrTiO3, the 2-DES at the interface between LaAlO3 and SrTiO3, and Nb superconducting thin film systems using scanning superconducting quantum interference device susceptometry, with spatial resolution as fine as 0.7 μm. We show that these features can be modeled as locally suppressed superfluid density, with a single parameter that characterizes the strength of each feature. This method provides a systematic means of finding and quantifying submicron defects in two-dimensional superconductors.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| SrTiO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| SrTiO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Microscopic Theory of Superconductor-Constriction-Superconductor Josephson Junctions in a Magnetic Field
similarity 0.93A. Gumann et al. · 2007 · arXiv:cond-mat/0703579
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nuclear Spin-Lattice Relaxation Rate in Odd-Frequency Superconductivity
similarity 0.92Shumpei Iwasaki & Yoji Ohashi · 2024 · arXiv:2409.10894
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Time reversal invariant topological 1D and 2D superconductors: doubling the Sau-Luchtin-Tewari-Sarma and Oreg-Refael-von Oppen proposals
similarity 0.92Garry Goldstein · 2024 · arXiv:2403.01696
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of Defects in Superconducting Phase of Twisted Bilayer Graphene
similarity 0.92Hui Yang et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1908.09555
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dissipative phase-fluctuations in superconducting wires capacitively coupled to diffusive metals
similarity 0.92Alejandro M. Lobos & Thierry Giamarchi · 2010 · arXiv:1004.4346
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
New approach to theory of tunneling spectroscopy in unconventional superconductors
similarity 0.92A. V. Burmistrova et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1210.1479
Source status unknown — claims are unverified