Adiabatic perturbation theory of nonequilibrium light-controlled superconductivity
Andrea Secchi, Marco Polini
arXiv:1806.02568 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.144513 · 2018-06-07 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recent experiments, in which Terahertz (THz) light has been used to induce nonequilibrium superconducting states, have raised a number of intriguing fundamental questions. Theoretically, these experiments are most often described within the Floquet formalism, which suffers a number of well-known limitations (e.g. Floquet heating). Alternative approaches rely on heavy numerical methods. In this Article we develop an analytical theory of nonequilibrium superconductivity that combines path integrals on the Kostantinov-Perel' time contour with adiabatic perturbation theory [G. Rigolin, G. Ortiz, and V.H. Ponce, Phys. Rev. A~{\bf 78}, 052508 (2008)]. We consider a general system of electrons and Raman phonons coupled by the Fröhlich interaction, in the presence of a time-dependent external field which acts on the phonon subsystem. The latter is supposed to model the THz light-induced excitation of nonlinear interactions between infrared and Raman phonons. Assuming that the external field has a slow dependence on time, we derive equations for the dynamical superconducting gap, calculating the leading adiabatic term and the first non-adiabatic correction. Our nonequilibrium formulas can be solved numerically with a minimal increase of computational complexity with respect to that needed to calculate the superconducting gap at equilibrium.
Similar papers
Tail States in Disordered Superconductors with Magnetic Impurities: the Unitarity Limit
similarity 0.89Francesca M. Marchetti & B. D. Simons · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0111195
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal fluctuations and squeezing in generalized Dicke model near the superradiant phase transition
similarity 0.89D. S. Shapiro et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1909.10252
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
s+is superconductivity with incipient bands: doping dependence and STM signatures
similarity 0.88Jakob Boeker et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1704.08185
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gauge-invariant microscopic kinetic theory of superconductivity in response to electromagnetic fields
similarity 0.88F. Yang & M. W. Wu · 2018 · arXiv:1807.03414
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in multi-Weyl semimetals: Conditions for the coexistence of topological and conventional phases
similarity 0.88Alonso Tapia & Enrique Muñoz · 2025 · arXiv:2512.18962
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Some universal relations between the gap and thermodynamic functions plausible for various models of superconductors
similarity 0.88R. Gonczarek & M. Krzyzosiak · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0305191
Source status unknown — claims are unverified