Reply to "Comment on `No evidence for orbital loop currents in charge-ordered YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{6+x}$ from polarized neutron diffraction' "
T. P. Croft, E. Blackburn, J. Kulda, Ruixing Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N Hardy, S. M. Hayden
arXiv:1807.06250 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.016502 · 2018-07-17 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The issues raised in the preceding comment of Bourges et al. [arXiv:1710.08173, Phys. Rev. B 98, 016501 (2018)] are shown to be unfounded. We highlight the complications caused by inhomogeneous beam polarization that can occur when using polarized neutron diffraction to detect small magnetic moments.
Similar papers
Comment on "No Evidence for Orbital Loop Currents in Charge Ordered from Polarized Neutron Diffraction"
similarity 0.90P. Bourges et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1710.08173
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
No Evidence for Orbital Loop Currents in Charge Ordered YBaCuO from Polarized Neutron Diffraction
similarity 0.89T. P. Croft et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1709.06128
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on "Magnetic Order in the Pseudogap Phase of High-Tc Superconductors''
similarity 0.88J. E. Sonier · 2008 · arXiv:0805.0319
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Orbital Magnetism in the Cuprates
similarity 0.88Sudip Chakravarty et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0112109
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Progress in Neutron Scattering Studies of Spin Excitations in High-Tc Cuprates
similarity 0.87Masaki Fujita et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1108.4431
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Polarized Neutron Scattering
similarity 0.87B. Roessli & P. Böni · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0012180
Source status unknown — claims are unverified