Searching for gap zeros in Sr2RuO4 via field-angle-dependent specific-heat measurement
Shunichiro Kittaka, Shota Nakamura, Toshiro Sakakibara, Naoki Kikugawa, Taichi Terashima, Shinya Uji, Dmitry A. Sokolov, Andrew P. Mackenzie, Koki Irie, Yasumasa Tsutsumi, Katsuhiro Suzuki, Kazushige Machida
arXiv:1807.08909 · DOI 10.7566/JPSJ.87.093703 · 2018-07-24 · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The gap structure of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, which is a longstanding candidate for a chiral p-wave superconductor, has been investigated from the perspective of the dependence of its specific heat on magnetic field angles at temperatures as low as 0.06 K ($\sim 0.04T_{\rm c}$). Except near $H_{\rm c2}$, its fourfold specific-heat oscillation under an in-plane rotating magnetic field is unlikely to change its sign down to the lowest temperature of 0.06 K. This feature is qualitatively different from nodal quasiparticle excitations of a quasi-two-dimensional superconductor possessing vertical lines of gap minima. The overall specific-heat behavior of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ can be explained by Doppler-shifted quasiparticles around horizontal line nodes on the Fermi surface, whose in-plane Fermi velocity is highly anisotropic, along with the occurrence of the Pauli-paramagnetic effect. These findings, in particular, the presence of horizontal line nodes in the gap, call for a reconsideration of the order parameter of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.505 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeCoIn5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Optical conductivity of superconducting Sr_2RuO_4
similarity 0.92Balázs Dóra et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0301381
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Off-site-repulsion induced Triplet Superconductivity: a possibility of chiral p pairing in SrRuO
similarity 0.92Ryotaro Arita et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0404484
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coexisting superconducting and spiral spin orders: models of ruthenate
similarity 0.91A. A. Ovchinnikov & M. Ya. Ovchinnikova · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0205529
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-Orbit Coupling and Symmetry of the Order Parameter in Strontium Ruthenate
similarity 0.91James F. Annett et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0411169
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Is Sr2RuO4 a triplet superconductor?
similarity 0.91K. Machida & M. Ichioka · 2007 · arXiv:0706.1426
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nodal Structure of Unconventional Superconductors Probed by the Angle Resolved Thermal Transport Measurements
similarity 0.91Y. Matsuda et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0611371
Source status unknown — claims are unverified