The nature of the phase transition in the cuprates as revealed by a magnetic field free stiffness meter
Itzik Kapon, Zaher Salman, Thomas Prokscha, Nir Gavish, Amit Keren
arXiv:1808.04820 · DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-10480-x · 2018-08-14 · Nature Communications
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A new method to measure the superconducting stiffness tensor $\overlineρ_s$, without subjecting the sample to magnetic field, is applied to La$_{1.875}$Sr$_{0.125}$CuO$_4$ (LSCO). The method is based on the London equation $\bf{J}=-\overlineρ_s \bf{A}$, where $\bf{J}$ is the current density and $\bf{A}$ is the vector potential. Using rotor free $\bf{A}$ and measuring $\bf{J}$ via the magnetic moment of superconducting rings, we extract $\overlineρ_s$ at $T\rightarrow T_c$. The technique, named Stiffnessometer, is sensitive to very small stiffness, which translates to penetration depth on the order of a few millimeters. We apply this method to two different LSCO rings: one with the current running only in the CuO$_2$ planes, and another where the current must cross planes. We find different transition temperatures for the two rings, namely, there is a temperature range with two dimensional stiffness. The Stiffnessometer results are accompanied by Low Energy $μ$SR measurements on the same sample to determine the stiffness anisotropy at $T < T_c$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.875Sr0.125CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.875Sr0.125CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Relevance of magnetism to cuprate superconductivity: Lanthanides versus charge-compensated cuprates
similarity 0.91Amit Keren et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1910.12251
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stiffnessometer, a magnetic-field-free superconducting stiffness meter and its application
similarity 0.88Itay Mangel et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1705.00624
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Study of the mixed state of La_{1.83}Sr_{0.17}CuO_{4} by means of muon-spin rotation and magnetization experiments in a low magnetic field
similarity 0.88B. M. Wojek et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1109.5367
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-charge interplay in antiferromagnetic LaSrCuO studied by the muons, neutrons, and ARPES techniques
similarity 0.88Gil Drachuck et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1402.6936
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Muon-Spin-Rotation Measurements of the Penetration Depth in the Infinite-Layer Electron-Doped Cuprate Superconductor Sr0.9La0.1CuO2
similarity 0.87A. Shengelaya et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0503183
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetism, superconductivity and coupling in cuprate heterostructures probed by low-energy muon-spin rotation
similarity 0.87B. M. Wojek et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1112.2879
Source status unknown — claims are unverified