Spin Susceptibility, Upper Critical Field and Disorder Effect in $j=\frac{3}{2}$ Superconductors with Singlet-Quintet Mixing
Jiabin Yu, Chao-Xing Liu
arXiv:1809.04736 · 2018-09-13
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recently, a new pairing state with the mixing between s-wave singlet channel and isotropic d-wave quintet channel induced by centrosymmetric spin-orbit coupling has been theoretically proposed in the superconducting materials with $j=\frac{3}{2}$ electrons. In this work, we derive the expressions of the zero-temperature spin susceptibility, the upper critical field close to the zero-field critical temperature $T_c$ and the critical temperature with weak random non-magnetic disorders for the singlet-quintet mixed state based on the Luttinger model. Our study revealed the following features of the singlet-quintet mixing. (1) The zero-temperature spin susceptibility remains zero for the singlet-quintet mixed state if only the centrosymmetric spin-orbit coupling is taken into account, and will deviate from zero when the non-centrosymmetric spin-orbit coupling is introduced. (2) The singlet-quintet mixing can help enhance the upper critical field roughly because it can increase $T_c$. (3) Although the quintet channel is generally suppressed by the non-magnetic disorder scattering, we find the strong mixing between singlet and quintet channels can help to stabilize the quintet channel. As a result, we still find a sizable quintet component mixed into the singlet channel in the presence of weak random non-magnetic disorders. Our work provides the guidance for future experiments on spin susceptibility and upper critical field of the singlet-quintet mixed superconducting states, and illustrates the stability of the singlet-quintet mixing against the weak random non-magnetic disorder.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LaPtBi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| YPtBi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| LuPtBi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| ErPdBi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| LuPdBi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| HoPdBi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| YPdBi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| SmPdBi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| TbPdBi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| DyPdBi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| TmPdBi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Surface Majorana Flat Bands in Superconductors with Singlet-Quintet Mixing
similarity 0.94Jiabin Yu & Chao-Xing Liu · 2018 · arXiv:1809.07455
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tuning the Parity Mixing of Singlet-Septet Pairing in a Half-Heusler Superconductor
similarity 0.91K. Ishihara et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2110.01819
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Diamagnetic susceptibility of spin-triplet ferromagnetic superconductors
similarity 0.90H. Belich et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1007.5432
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Odd-frequency pairing and Ising spin susceptibility in time-reversal invariant superfluids and superconductors
similarity 0.90Takeshi Mizushima · 2014 · arXiv:1408.6664
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic theory of in-plane critical field in two-dimensional Ising superconducting systems
similarity 0.89Hongchao Liu et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1909.08819
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impact of the spin-orbit interaction on the phase diagram and anisotropy of the in-plane critical magnetic field in superconducting LaAlO/SrTiO interface
similarity 0.89P. Wójcik et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2106.12317
Source status unknown — claims are unverified