Nano-bridge Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices: beyond the Josephson limit
Dibyendu Hazra
arXiv:1809.09510 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.144505 · 2018-09-25 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Nano-scale superconducting quantum interference devices (nano-SQUIDS) where the weak-links are made from nano-bridges --- i.e., nano-bridge--SQUIDs (NBSs) --- are one of the most sensitive magnetometers for nano-scale magnetometry. Because of very strong non-linearity in the nano-bridge--electrode joints, the applied magnetic flux ($Φ_{a}$) -- critical current ($I_{c}$) characteristics of NBSs differ very significantly from conventional tunnel-junction-SQUIDs, especially when nano-bridges are long and/or the screening parameter is large. However, in most of the theoretical descriptions, NBSs have been treated like conventional tunnel-junction-SQUIDs, which are based on d.c. Josephson effect. Here, I present a model demonstrating that for long nano-bridges and/or large screening parameter the $I_{c}(Φ_{a})$ of a NBS can be explained by merely considering the fluxoid quantization in the NBS loop and the energy of the NBS; it is not necessary to take the Josephson effect into consideration. I also demonstrate that using the model, we can derive useful expressions like modulation depth and transfer function. I also discuss the role of kinetic inductance fraction ($κ$) in determining $I_{c}(Φ_{a})$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Micron size superconducting quantum interference devices of lead (Pb)
similarity 0.92Sagar Paul et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1612.09200
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Advanced superconducting circuits and devices
similarity 0.91Martin Weides & Hannes Rotzinger · 2014 · arXiv:1402.6857
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermoelectric transport in the topological phase due to the coexistence of superconductivity and spin-density-wave
similarity 0.90Amit Gupta & Debanand Sa · 2015 · arXiv:1504.08207
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson Junctions with Artificial Superparamagnetic Barrier: A Promising Avenue for Nanoscale Magnetometry
similarity 0.89Ivan P. Nevirkovets et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting quantum interference devices with submicron Nb/HfTi/Nb junctions for investigation of small magnetic particles
similarity 0.88J. Nagel et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1106.1985
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of large and oscillations in a proximity dc superconducting quantum interference device
similarity 0.88Jian Wei et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0803.3104
Source status unknown — claims are unverified