← Back to search

Evidence for the presence of the Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov state in CeCu$_2$Si$_2$ revealed using $^{63}$Cu NMR

Shunsaku Kitagawa, Genki Nakamine, Kenji Ishida, H. S. Jeevan, C. Geibel, F. Steglich

arXiv:1810.06135 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.157004 · 2018-10-15 · Physical review letters

T1experimental21 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Nuclear magnetic resonance measurements were performed on CeCu$_{2}$Si$_{2}$ in the presence of a magnetic field close to the upper critical field $μ_{0} H_{\rm c2}$ in order to investigate its superconducting (SC) properties near pair-breaking fields. In lower fields, the Knight shift and nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rate divided by temperature $1/T_1T$ abruptly decreased below the SC transition temperature $T_{\rm c}(H)$, a phenomenon understood within the framework of conventional spin-singlet superconductivity. In contrast, $1/T_1T$ was enhanced just below $T_{\rm c}(H)$ and exhibited a broad maximum when magnetic fields close to $μ_0H_{\rm c2}(0)$ were applied parallel or perpendicular to the $c$ axis, although the Knight shift decreased just below $T_{\rm c}(H)$. This enhancement of $1/T_1T$, which was recently observed in the organic superconductor $κ$-(BEDT-TTF)$_{2}$Cu(NCS)$_{2}$, suggests the presence of high-density Andreev bound states in the inhomogeneous SC region, a hallmark of the Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov phase.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
CeCu2Si2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu(NCS)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers