Signatures of non-adiabatic superconductivity in lithium-decorated graphene
Dominik Szczȩśniak, Radosław Szczȩśniak
arXiv:1810.07980 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.224512 · 2018-10-18 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recent experimental studies confirmed that a long searched conventional superconducting phase in graphene can be induced via lithium deposition. However, the canonical character of the lithium-decorated graphene (LiC$_{6}$) superconductor postulated therein, as defined by the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory, is ambiguous due to the moderate electron-phonon coupling constant and low Fermi energy in this material. Herein, this issue is addressed within the Migdal-Eliashberg formalism and beyond it via the first-order electron-phonon vertex corrections, to account for the potentially pivotal effects, hitherto not captured. The conducted analysis yields similar value of the metal-superconductor transition temperature as in the previous studies ($T_{C} \sim 6$ K), yet for a weaker depairing electron correlations, which magnitude in the non-adiabatic regime approaches predictions of the Morel-Anderson model. Moreover, the characteristic ratio of the pairing gap and the inverse temperature is found to notably exceeds estimates of the BCS theory. In a results, it is argued that the superconducting state in LiC$_{6}$ may have non-canonical character strongly influenced by the non-adiabatic and retardation effects. Moreover, discussed phase appears as a vital case study, which suggests that other two-dimensional superconductors of hexagonal structure may exhibit similar non-canonical behavior as LiC$_{6}$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiC6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Signatures of nonadiabatic superconductivity in lithium-decorated graphene
similarity 0.91Dominik Szczȩśniak & Radosław Szczȩśniak
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Graphene-Lithium
similarity 0.90D. M. Guzman et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1310.3813
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of lithium doping on the thermodynamic properties of graphene based superconductors
similarity 0.89D. Szczȩśniak et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1311.0823
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strain Enhanced Superconductivity in Li-Doped Graphene
similarity 0.89Jelena Pešić et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1412.1968
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
First-principles calculations of the superconducting properties in Li-decorated monolayer graphene within the anisotropic Migdal-Eliashberg formalism
similarity 0.89Jing-Jing Zheng & E. R. Margine · 2017 · arXiv:1703.03008
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scalability of non-adiabatic effects in lithium-decorated graphene superconductor
similarity 0.89Dominik Szczȩśniak · 2023 · arXiv:2301.13697
Source status unknown — claims are unverified