Evidence for a preformed Cooper pair model in the pseudogap spectra of a Ca10(Pt4As8)(Fe2As2)5 single crystal with a nodal superconducting gap
Yu-il Seo, Woo-jae Choi, Shin-ichi Kimura, Yong Seung Kwon
arXiv:1810.10822 · DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-40528-3 · 2018-10-25 · Scientific Reports
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
For high-Tc superconductors, clarifying the role and origin of the pseudogap is essential for understanding the pairing mechanism. Among the various models describing the pseudogap, the preformed Cooper pair model is a potential candidate. Therefore, we present experimental evidence for the preformed Cooper pair model by studying the pseudogap spectrum observed in the optical conductivity of a Ca10(Pt4As8)(Fe2As2)5 (Tc = 34.6 K) single crystal. We observed a clear pseudogap structure in the optical conductivity and observed its temperature dependence. In the superconducting (SC) state, one SC gap with a gap size of Δ = 26 cm-1, a scattering rate of 1/τ = 360 cm-1 and a low-frequency extra Drude component were observed. Spectral weight analysis revealed that the SC gap and pseudogap are formed from the same Drude band. This means that the pseudogap is a gap structure observed as a result of a continuous temperature evolution of the SC gap observed below Tc. This provides clear experimental evidence for the preformed Cooper pair model.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ca10(Pt4As8)(Fe2As2)5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 34.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Pseudogap Induced by Superconducting Fluctuation in the d-p Model
similarity 0.90Akito Kobayashi et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9907006
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Preformed Cooper Pairs in Layered FeSe-Based Superconductors
similarity 0.90B. L. Kang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spectroscopic evidence for preformed Cooper pairs in the pseudogap phase of cuprates
similarity 0.89M. Shi et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0810.0292
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possible superconducting fluctuation and pseudogap state above in CsFeAs
similarity 0.89Huan Yang et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1604.07159
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudogap formation above the superconducting dome in iron-pnictides
similarity 0.89T. Shimojima et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1305.3875
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting energy gap versus pseudogap in hole-doped cuprates as revealed by infrared spectroscopy
similarity 0.89T. Dong et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified