Theory of Supercurrent generation in BCS Superconductors
Hiroyasu Koizumi
arXiv:1810.12508 · 2018-10-30 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We revisit the supercurrent generation mechanism for superconductors whose superconducting transition temperature are explained by the BCS theory, motivated by the reexamination of the ac Josephson effect [J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. (2015) 28:61] that indicates the electromagnetic vector potential ${\bf A}^{\rm em}$ couples to each electron in the pairing electrons, separately, as $e{\bf A}^{\rm em}$, not together as $2e{\bf A}^{\rm em}$. To satisfy the above finding, we argue that the origin of the supercurrent generation is the emergence of Dirac strings with $π$ flux inside. It appears if the Rashba spin-orbit interaction is added to the BCS model due to its stabilization of the spin-twisting itinerant motion of electrons. The $π$-flux Dirac string generates the cyclotron motion without external magnetic field, and produces topologically protected loop current. This can be also attributed to the emergence of the $U(1)$ instanton of the Berry connection ${\bf A}^{\rm fic}=-{ \hbar \over {2e}} \nabla χ$, ${\bf \varphi}^{\rm fic}={ \hbar \over {2e}} \partial_t χ$, where $χ$ is an angular variable of period $2π$. The phase of the macroscopic wave function for the Ginzburg-Landau theory or the phase of the pair potential of the Bogoliubov-de Gennes equations is identified as $χ$. If it is treated as a phenomenological parameter, the Ginzburg-Landau theory or the Bogoliubov-de Gennes equations can be used without modification. However, the new origin requires the Rashba interaction for the occurrence of superconductivity. This may explain the fact that ideal metals like sodium does not show superconductivity since the screening of the electric field is efficient in such materials, suppressing the internal electric field too weak to occur superconductivity.
Similar papers
An amendment of the BCS theory of superconductivity
similarity 0.91Anghel, Dragos-Victor · 2016 · arXiv:1611.07094
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fabry-Pérot interference in Josephson junctions
similarity 0.91Sushil Kumar Sahu & Abhiram Soori · 2023 · arXiv:2307.05098
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
DC Josephson Effect in SNS Junctions of Anisotropic Superconductors
similarity 0.91Yasuhiro Asano · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0110085
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multiple solutions for the equilibrium populations in BCS superconductors
similarity 0.91Dragos-Victor Anghel · 2019 · arXiv:1908.06017
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
ac Josephson effect in asymmetric superconducting quantum point contacts
similarity 0.90Shin-Tza Wu & Sungkit Yip · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0407163
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A New Approach to the Josephson Effect
similarity 0.90Yong-Jihn Kim · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0401374
Source status unknown — claims are unverified