Competition between spin-induced charge instabilities in underdoped cuprates
Roland Zeyher, Andres Greco
arXiv:1812.03891 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.224504 · 2018-12-10 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the static charge correlation function in an one-band model on a square lattice. The Hamiltonian consist of effective hoppings of the electrons between the lattice sites and the Heisenberg Hamiltonian. Approximating the irreducible charge correlation function by a single bubble yields the ladder approximation for the charge correlation function. In this approximation one finds in general three charge instabilities, two of them are due to nesting, the third one is the flux phase instability. Since these instabilities cannot explain the experiments in hole-doped cuprates we have included in the irreducible charge correlation function also Aslamasov-Larkin (AL) diagrams where charge fluctuations interact with products of spin fluctuations. We then find at high temperatures a nematic or $d$-wave Pomeranchuk instability with a very small momentum. Its transition temperature decreases roughly linearly with doping in the underdoped region and vanishes near optimal doping. Decreasing the temperature further a secondary axial charge-density wave (CDW) instability appears with mainly $d$-wave symmetry and a wave vector somewhat larger than the distance between nearest neighbor hot spots. At still lower temperatures the diagonal flux phase instability emerges. A closer look shows that the AL diagrams enhance mainly axial and not diagonal charge fluctuations in our one-band model. This is the main reason why axial and not diagonal instabilities are the leading ones in agreement with experiment. The two instabilities due to nesting vanish already at very low temperatures and do not play any major role in the phase diagram. Remarkable is that the nematic and the axial CDW instabilities show a large reentrant behavior.
Similar papers
Superconducting d-wave stripes in cuprates: Valence bond order coexisting with nodal quasiparticles
similarity 0.91Matthias Vojta & Oliver Rösch · 2007 · arXiv:0709.4244
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Long-range order and pinning of charge-density waves in competition with superconductivity
similarity 0.90Yosef Caplan et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1502.07498
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic approach to high-temperature superconductors: Pseudogap phase
similarity 0.89S. Sykora & K. W. Becker · 2009 · arXiv:0903.0921
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phenomenological description of competing antiferromagnetism and d-wave superconductivity in high cuprates
similarity 0.89Bumsoo Kyung & A. M. -S. Tremblay · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0204500
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge density waves in cuprate superconductors beyond the critical doping
similarity 0.89H. Miao et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2001.10294
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effective interactions and superconductivity in the t-J model in the large-N limit
similarity 0.89R. Zeyher & A. Greco · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9808283
Source status unknown — claims are unverified