Probabilistic vortex crossing criterion for superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors
Saman Jahani, Li-Ping Yang, Adrian Buganza Tepole, Joseph C. Bardin, Hong X. Tang, Zubin Jacob
arXiv:1901.09291 · DOI 10.1063/1.5132961 · 2019-01-26
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors have emerged as a promising technology for quantum metrology from the mid-infrared to ultra-violet frequencies. Despite the recent experimental successes, a predictive model to describe the detection event in these detectors is needed to optimize the detection metrics. Here, we propose a probabilistic criterion for single-photon detection based on single-vortex (flux quanta) crossing the width of the nanowire. Our model makes a connection between the dark-counts and photon-counts near the detection threshold. The finite-difference calculations demonstrate that a change in the bias current distribution as a result of the photon absorption significantly increases the probability of single-vortex crossing even if the vortex potential barrier has not vanished completely. We estimate the instrument response function and show that the timing uncertainty of this vortex tunneling process corresponds to a fundamental limit in timing jitter of the click event. We demonstrate a trade-space between this intrinsic (quantum) timing jitter, quantum efficiency, and dark count rate in TaN, WSi, and NbN superconducting nanowires at different experimental conditions. Our detection model can also explain the experimental observation of exponential decrease in the quantum efficiency of SNSPDs at lower energies. This leads to a pulse-width dependency in the quantum efficiency, and it can be further used as an experimental test to compare across different detection models.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| TaN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8.57 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| WSi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Vortex-assisted mechanism of photon counting in a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector revealed by external magnetic field
similarity 0.90D. Yu. Vodolazov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Experimental Test of Theories of the Detection Mechanism in a Nanowire Superconducting Single Photon Detector
similarity 0.90J. J. Renema et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors for Quantum Information
similarity 0.90Lixing You · 2020 · arXiv:2006.00411
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Statistical analysis of the temporal single-photon response of superconducting nanowire single photon detection
similarity 0.90Y. -H. He et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1506.07919
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex-assisted photon counts and their magnetic field dependence in single-photon superconducting detectors
similarity 0.89L. N. Bulaevskii et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Photocounting statistics of superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors
similarity 0.89V. A. Uzunova & A. A. Semenov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified