Quenched nematic criticality separating two superconducting domes in an iron-based superconductor under pressure
P. Reiss, D. Graf, A. A. Haghighirad, W. Knafo, L. Drigo, M. Bristow, A. J. Schofield, A. I. Coldea
arXiv:1902.11276 · DOI 10.1038/s41567-019-0694-2 · 2019-02-28
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The nematic electronic state and its associated nematic critical fluctuations have emerged as potential candidates for superconducting pairing in various unconventional superconductors. However, in most materials their coexistence with other magnetically-ordered phases poses significant challenges in establishing their importance. Here, by combining chemical and hydrostatic physical pressure in FeSe$_{0.89}$S$_{0.11}$, we provide a unique access to a clean nematic quantum phase transition in the absence of a long-range magnetic order. We find that in the proximity of the nematic phase transition, there is an unusual non-Fermi liquid behavior in resistivity at high temperatures that evolves into a Fermi liquid behaviour at the lowest temperatures. From quantum oscillations in high magnetic fields, we trace the evolution of the Fermi surface and electronic correlations as a function of applied pressure. We detect experimentally a Lifshitz transition that separates two distinct superconducting regions: one emerging from the nematic electronic phase with a small Fermi surface and strong electronic correlations and the other one with a large Fermi surface and weak correlations that promotes nesting and stabilization of a magnetically-ordered phase at high pressures. The lack of mass divergence suggests that the nematic critical fluctuations are quenched by the strong coupling to the lattice. This establishes that superconductivity is not enhanced at the nematic quantum phase transition in the absence of magnetic order.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 40 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe0.89S0.11 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6.4 | 0.7 GPa | zero_resistance |
| FeSe0.89S0.11 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 22 | 2 GPa | zero_resistance |
| FeSe0.89S0.11 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | 3 GPa | unknown |
Similar papers
Two distinct superconducting pairing states divided by the nematic end point in FeSeS
similarity 0.92T. Hanaguri et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1710.02276
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The pressure-induced enhancement of superconducting properties of single-crystalline FeTe0.5Se0.5
similarity 0.92J Pietosa et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1205.3949
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nematicity, magnetism and superconductivity in FeSe
similarity 0.92Anna E. Böhmer & Andreas Kreisel · 2017 · arXiv:1711.06473
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin fluctuations in the ultranodal superconducting state of Fe(Se,S)
similarity 0.92Yifu Cao et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2404.03846
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Iron-Based Superconductors: A Decade of Materials, Magnetism, and Mechanisms
similarity 0.91Xingye Lu et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2607.11355
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Emergence of the nematic electronic state in FeSe
similarity 0.91M. D. Watson et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1502.02917
Source status unknown — claims are unverified