Demonstration of nonstoquastic Hamiltonian in coupled superconducting flux qubits
I. Ozfidan, C. Deng, A. Y. Smirnov, T. Lanting, R. Harris, L. Swenson, J. Whittaker, F. Altomare, M. Babcock, C. Baron, A. J. Berkley, K. Boothby, H. Christiani, P. Bunyk, C. Enderud, B. Evert, M. Hager, A. Hajda, J. Hilton, S. Huang, E. Hoskinson, M. W. Johnson, K. Jooya, E. Ladizinsky, N. Ladizinsky, R. Li, A. MacDonald, D. Marsden, G. Marsden, T. Medina, R. Molavi, R. Neufeld, M. Nissen, M. Norouzpour, T. Oh, I. Pavlov, I. Perminov, G. Poulin-Lamarre, M. Reis, T. Prescott, C. Rich, Y. Sato, G. Sterling, N. Tsai, M. Volkmann, W. Wilkinson, J. Yao, M. H. Amin
arXiv:1903.06139 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.034037 · 2019-03-14
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Quantum annealing (QA) is a heuristic algorithm for finding low-energy configurations of a system, with applications in optimization, machine learning, and quantum simulation. Up to now, all implementations of QA have been limited to qubits coupled via a single degree of freedom. This gives rise to a stoquastic Hamiltonian that has no sign problem in quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) simulations. In this paper, we report implementation and measurements of two superconducting flux qubits coupled via two canonically conjugate degrees of freedom (charge and flux) to achieve a nonstoquastic Hamiltonian. Such coupling can enhance performance of QA processors, extend the range of quantum simulations. We perform microwave spectroscopy to extract circuit parameters and show that the charge coupling manifests itself as a YY interaction in the computational basis. We observe destructive interference in quantum coherent oscillations between the computational basis states of the two-qubit system. Finally, we show that the extracted Hamiltonian is nonstoquastic over a wide range of parameters.
Similar papers
Multilevel resonant tunneling in the presence of flux and charge noise
similarity 0.92Anatoly Y. Smirnov et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2209.10605
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multiqubit quantum phase gate using four-level superconducting quantum interference devices coupled to superconducting resonator
similarity 0.91Muhammad Waseem et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1212.5277
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A theoretical analysis of flux-qubit measurements with a dc-SQUID
similarity 0.91H. Nakano et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0406622
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Experimental Demonstration of a Robust and Scalable Flux Qubit
similarity 0.90R. Harris et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0909.4321
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Demonstration of a Nonstoquastic Hamiltonian in Coupled Superconducting Flux Qubits
similarity 0.89I. Ozfidan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum non-demolition measurements of a qubit coupled to a harmonic oscillator
similarity 0.89Luca Chirolli & Guido Burkard · 2009 · arXiv:0906.0906
Source status unknown — claims are unverified