Molecular beam epitaxy growth of superconducting Sr2RuO4 films
M. Uchida, M. Ide, H. Watanabe, K. S. Takahashi, Y. Tokura, M. Kawasaki
arXiv:1903.08629 · DOI 10.1063/1.5007342 · 2019-03-20 · APL Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report growth of superconducting Sr2RuO4 films by oxide molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). Careful tuning of the Ru flux with an electron beam evaporator enables us to optimize growth conditions including the Ru/Sr flux ratio and also to investigate stoichiometry effects on the structural and transport properties. The highest onset transition temperature of about 1.1 K is observed for films grown in a slightly Ru-rich flux condition in order to suppress Ru deficiency. The realization of superconducting Sr2RuO4 films via oxide MBE opens up a new route to study the unconventional superconductivity of this material.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.1 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.8 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.5 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.9 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Improved Single-Crystal Growth of SrRuO
similarity 0.87J. S. Bobowski et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1811.02634
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
New Materials, New Functionalities: Molecular Beam Epitaxy of Ultra-High Conductivity Oxides
similarity 0.87Gaurab Rimal et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2508.10885
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Epitaxial growth and superconductivity of optimally doped Sr1−xEuxCuO2 cuprate films
similarity 0.86Hang Yan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Characterization of Sr2RuO4 Josephson junctions made of epitaxial films
similarity 0.86Masaki Uchida et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2001.01844
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Epitaxial Growth of Perovskite SrBiO Film on SrTiO by Oxide Molecular Beam Epitaxy
similarity 0.86Fengmiao Li et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1910.02619
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Role of Oxygen States in the Low Valence Nickelate LaNiO
similarity 0.86Y. Shen et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2110.08937
Source status unknown — claims are unverified