The influence of anti-chiral edge states on Andreev reflection in graphene-superconductor junction
Chao Wang, Lin Zhang, Peipei Zhang, Juntao Song, Yu-Xian Li
arXiv:1904.06649 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.045407 · 2019-04-14 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Using the tight binding model and the non-equilibrium Green function method, we study Andreev reflection in graphene-superconductor junction, where graphene has two nonequal Dirac Cones split in energy and therefore time reversal symmetry is broken. Due to the anti-chiral edge states of the current graphene model, an incident electron travelling along the edges makes distinct contribution to Andreev reflections. In a two-terminal device, because Andreev retro-reflection is not allowed for just the anti-chiral edges, in this case the mutual scattering between edge and bulk states is necessary, which leads that the coefficient of Andreev retro-reflection is always symmetrical about the incident energy. In a four-terminal junction, however, the edges are parallel to the interface of superconductor and graphene, so at the interface an incident electron travelling along the edges can be retro-reflected as a hole into bulk modes, or specularly reflected as a hole into anti-chiral edge states again. It is noted that, the coefficient of specular Andreev reflection keeps symmetric as to the incident energy of electron which is consistent with the reported results before, however the coefficient of Andreev retro-reflection shows an unexpected asymmetrical behavior due to the presence of anti-chiral edge states. Our results present some new ideas to study the anti-chiral edge modes and Andreev reflection for a graphene model with the broken time reversal symmetry.
Similar papers
Influence of antichiral edge states on Andreev reflection in graphene-superconductor junction
similarity 0.94Chao Wang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum Hall Andreev Conversion in Graphene Nanostructures
similarity 0.90Alexey Bondarev et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2507.02114
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson effect in mesoscopic graphene strips with finite width
similarity 0.90Ali G. Moghaddam & Malek Zareyan · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0611577
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The spin-polarized state of graphene: a spin superconductor
similarity 0.89Qing-feng Sun & X. C. Xie · 2013 · arXiv:1306.4154
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dirac-fermions and conductance-oscillations in (s,d)-wave superconductor/normal graphene junctions
similarity 0.89J. Linder & A. Sudbø · 2007 · arXiv:0707.4406
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunable Anomalous Andreev Reflection and Triplet Pairings in Spin Orbit Coupled Graphene
similarity 0.89Razieh Beiranvand et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1709.06150
Source status unknown — claims are unverified