p-Wave Superconductivity in Iron-based Superconductors
E. F. Talantsev, K. Iida, T. Ohmura, T. Matsumoto, W. P. Crump, N. M. Strickland, S. C. Wimbush, H. Ikuta
arXiv:1905.00183 · DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-50687-y · 2019-05-01 · Scientific Reports
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The possibility of p-wave pairing in superconductors has been proposed more than five decades ago, but has not yet been convincingly demonstrated. One difficulty is that some p-wave states are thermodynamically indistinguishable from s-wave, while others are very similar to d-wave states. Here we studied the self-field critical current of NdFeAs(O,F) thin films in order to extract absolute values of the London penetration depth, the superconducting energy gap, and the relative jump in specific heat at the superconducting transition temperature, and find that all the deduced physical parameters strongly indicate that NdFeAs(O,F) is a bulk p-wave superconductor. Further investigation revealed that single atomic layer FeSe also shows p-wave pairing. In an attempt to generalize these findings, we re-examined the whole inventory of superfluid density measurements in iron-based superconductors show quite generally that most of the iron-based superconductors are p-wave superconductors.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NdFeAs(O,F) Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| NdFeAs(O,F) Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Signature of multigap nodeless superconductivity in fluorine-doped NdFeAsO
similarity 0.88A. Adamski et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1709.05104
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
ARPES measurements of the superconducting gap of Fe-based superconductors and their implications to the pairing mechanism
similarity 0.87P. Richard et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1503.07269
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution from Unconventional Spin Density Wave to Superconductivity and a Pseudogaplike Phase in NaFe1−xCoxAs
similarity 0.87Xiaodong Zhou et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possible strong electron-lattice interaction and giant magneto-elastic effects in Fe-pnictides
similarity 0.87Miodrag L. Kulic & Amir A. Haghighirad · 2009 · arXiv:0904.3512
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping dependence of the anisotropic quasiparticle interference in NaFe1-xCoxAs iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.87Peng Cai et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1403.0090
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin Fluctuation Dynamics and Multiband Superconductivity in Iron Pnictides
similarity 0.87Valentin Stanev et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0809.0014
Source status unknown — claims are unverified