← Back to search

Local flux-flow instability in superconducting films near Tc

A. I. Bezuglyj, V. A. Shklovskij, R. V. Vovk, V. M. Bevz, M. Huth, O. V. Dobrovolskiy

arXiv:1905.03564 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.174518 · 2019-05-09 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical42 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Larkin and Ovchinnikov established that the viscous flow of magnetic flux quanta in current-biased superconductor films placed in a perpendicular magnetic field can lose stability due to a decrease in the vortex viscosity coefficient $η$ with increasing velocity of the vortices $v$. The dependence of $η$ on $v$ leads to a $nonlinear$ section in the current-voltage ($I$-$V$) curve which ends at the flux-flow instability point with a voltage jump to a highly resistive state. At the same time, in contradistinction with the nonlinear conductivity regime, instability jumps often occur in $linear$ $I$-$V$ sections. Here, for the elucidation of such jumps we develop a theory of local instability of the magnetic flux flow occurring not in the entire film but in a narrow strip across the film width in which vortices move much faster than outside it. The predictions of the developed theory are in agreement with experiments on Nb films for which the heat removal coefficients and the inelastic scattering times of quasiparticles are deduced. The presented model of local instability is also relevant for the characterization of superconducting thin films whose performance is examined for fast single-photon detection.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

8.86Pressure not reportedmidpoint
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

8.98Pressure not reportedmidpoint

Similar papers