Flux Flow Effects in Annular Josephson Tunnel Junctions
Roberto Monaco, Jesper Mygind, Valery P. Koshelets
arXiv:1905.07197 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.064501 · 2019-05-17
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate Josephson flux-flow in annular Josephson tunnel junctions (AJTJs) under the application of magnetic fields generating finite-voltage steps in their current-voltage characteristics. Experimental data are presented for confocal AJTJs which are the natural generalization of the well studied circular AJTJs for which flux flow effects have never been reported. Displaced linear slopes, Fiske step staircases and Eck steps were sequentially recorded at $4.2\,K$ with high-quality Nb/Al-AlOx/Nb confocal AJTJs when increasing the strength of a uniform magnetic field applied in the plane of the junction. Their amplitude was found to strongly depend not only on the strength, but also on the orientation, of the external field. Extensive numerical simulations based on a phenomenological sine-Gordon model developed for confocal AJTJs were carried out to disclose the basic flux-flow mechanism responsible for the appearance of magnetically induced steps and to elucidate the role of several critical parameters, namely, the field orientation, the system loss and the annulus eccentricity. It was found that in a topologically closed system, such as the AJTJ, where the number of trapped fluxons is conserved and new fluxons can be created only in the form of fluxon-antifluxon pairs, the existence of a steady viscous flow of Josephson vortices only relies on the capability of the fluxons and antifluxons to be generated and to annihilate each other inside the junction. This also implies that flux-flow effects are not observable in circular AJTJs.
Similar papers
Traveling Electromagnetic Waves in Annular Josephson Tunnel Junctions
similarity 0.90Roberto Monaco · 2019 · arXiv:1904.12184
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson Vortex Qubit based on a Confocal Annular Josephson Junction
similarity 0.89Roberto Monaco et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1707.01672
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Confocal Annular Josephson Tunnel Junctions with Large Eccentricity
similarity 0.89Roberto Monaco et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1805.07280
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Engineering Double-Well Potentials with Variable-Width Annular Josephson Tunnel Junctions
similarity 0.89Roberto Monaco · 2016 · arXiv:1606.02494
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermal escape of fractional vortices in long Josephson junctions
similarity 0.89U. Kienzle et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0903.3382
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A distributed, active patch antenna model of a Josephson oscillator
similarity 0.89Vladimir. M. Krasnov · 2022 · arXiv:2211.07299
Source status unknown — claims are unverified