Superfluid stiffness in cuprates: Effect of Mott transition and phase competition
O. Simard, C. -D. Hébert, A. Foley, D. Sénéchal, A. -M. S. Tremblay
arXiv:1906.06409 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.094506 · 2019-06-14 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superfluid stiffness $ρ_s$ is a defining characteristic of the superconducting state, allowing phase coherence and supercurrent. It is accessible experimentally through the penetration depth. Coexistence of $d$-wave superconductivity with other phases in underdoped cuprates, such as antiferromagnetism (AF) or charge-density waves (CDW), may drastically alter $ρ_s$. To shed light on this physics, the zero-temperature value of $ρ_s=ρ_{zz}$ along the $c$-axis was computed for different values of Hubbard interaction $U$ and different sets of tight-binding parameters describing the high-temperature superconductors YBCO and NCCO. We used Cellular Dynamical Mean-Field Theory for the one-band Hubbard model with exact diagonalization as impurity solver and state-of-the-art bath parametrization. We conclude that Mott physics plays a dominant role in determining the superfluid stiffness on the hole-doped side of the phase diagram. On the electron-doped side, antiferromagnetism wins over superconductivity near half-filling. But upon approaching optimal electron-doping, homogeneous coexistence between superconductivity and antiferromagnetism causes the superfluid stiffness to drop sharply. Hence, on the electron-doped side, it is competition between antiferromagnetism and $d$-wave superconductivity that plays a dominant role in determining the value of $ρ_{zz}$ near half-filling. At large overdoping, $ρ_{zz}$ behaves in a more BCS-like manner in both the electron- and hole-doped cases. We comment on some qualitative implications of these results for the superconducting transition temperature.
Similar papers
Self-doping and the Mott-Kondo scenario for infinite-layer nickelate superconductors
similarity 0.90Yi-feng Yang & Guang-Ming Zhang · 2021 · arXiv:2110.11089
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mottness induced superfluid phase fluctuation with increased density
similarity 0.89Zi-Jian Lang et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1902.11206
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the two-dimensional Hubbard model with cellular dynamical mean-field theory: a quantum impurity model analysis
similarity 0.89C. Walsh et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2307.02681
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity effect in a heterostructure of a high superconductor with a topological insulator from Dynamical mean field theory
similarity 0.89Xiancong Lu & David Sénéchal · 2019 · arXiv:1911.11898
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Antiferromagnetic to superconducting phase transition in the hole- and electron-doped Hubbard model at zero temperature
similarity 0.89M. Aichhorn et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spontaneous nematicity triggered by impurities in a Hubbard model for the cuprates
similarity 0.88Alexandre Foley & David Sénéchal · 2015 · arXiv:1512.07132
Source status unknown — claims are unverified