Superconductor versus insulator in twisted bilayer graphene
Yang-Zhi Chou, Yu-Ping Lin, Sankar Das Sarma, Rahul M. Nandkishore
arXiv:1906.10141 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.115128 · 2019-06-24 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a simple model that we believe captures the key aspects of the competition between superconducting and insulating states in twisted bilayer graphene. Within this model, the superconducting phase is primary, and arises at generic fillings, but is interrupted by the insulator at commensurate fillings. Importantly, the insulator forms because of electron-electron interactions, but the model is agnostic as to the superconducting pairing mechanism, which need not originate with electron-electron interactions. The model is composed of a collection of crossed one-dimensional quantum wires whose intersections form a superlattice. At each superlattice point, we place a locally superconducting puddle which can exchange Cooper pairs with the quantum wires. We analyze this model assuming weak wire-puddle and wire-wire couplings. We show that for a range of repulsive intrawire interactions, the system is superconducting at `generic' incommensurate fillings, with the superconductivity being `interrupted' by an insulating phase at commensurate fillings. We further show that the gapped insulating states at commensurate fillings give way to gapless states upon application of external Zeeman fields. These features are consistent with experimental observations in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphenes despite the distinct microscopic details. We further study the full phase diagram of this model and discover that it contains several distinct correlated insulating states, which we characterize herein.
Similar papers
Decoupling superconductivity and correlated insulators in twisted bilayer graphene
similarity 0.91Yu Saito et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1911.13302
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductor versus insulator in twisted bilayer graphene
similarity 0.90Yang-Zhi Chou et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity, correlated insulators, and Wess-Zumino-Witten terms in twisted bilayer graphene
similarity 0.90Maine Christos et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2007.00007
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transport signatures of topological phases in double nanowires probed by spin-polarized STM
similarity 0.90Manisha Thakurathi et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2001.05470
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Critical role of device geometry for the phase diagram of twisted bilayer graphene
similarity 0.89Zachary A. H. Goodwin et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1911.08464
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing in graphene-based moiré superlattices
similarity 0.89Mathias S. Scheurer & Rhine Samajdar · 2019 · arXiv:1906.03258
Source status unknown — claims are unverified