Comment on "Perfect Andreev reflection due to the Klein paradox in a topological superconducting state (Nature \textbf{570}, 344 (2019))"
Shekhar Das, Kurt Gloos, Yu. G. Naidyuk, Goutam Sheet
arXiv:1907.07338 · 2019-07-17 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In a recent publication, Lee $et$ $al.$ discussed experimental observation of Klein tunneling into a proximity-induced topological superconducting state of SmB$_{6}$ through the measurement of Andreev reflection with low-bias conductance doubling across point-contact junctions between sharp Pt-Ir tips and SmB$_{6}$/YB$_{6}$ heterostructures. However, the interpretation of the presented point-contact data is rather ambiguous because observing a low-bias conductance enhancement by a factor of 2 is not special for Klein tunneling into topological superconductors. Such an enhanced conductance can be observed in point contacts between all types of superconductors and normal metals when the contacts are neither in the ballistic nor in the diffusive regimes of mesoscopic transport, but in a dissipative thermal regime. The thermal regime is expected for the point contacts presented in Lee $et$ $al.$ primarily because of the anticipated very short electron mean free path of SmB$_6$ -- we will discuss this in more detail here.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| SmB6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ta Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| OsB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| PdTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Role of critical current on the point-contact Andreev reflection spectra between a normal metal and a superconductor
similarity 0.87Goutam Sheet et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection spectroscopy on SnAs single crystals
similarity 0.86Sandeep Howlader et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2111.14425
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of perfect Andreev reflection due to Klein paradox in a topological superconducting state
similarity 0.86Seunghun Lee et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1806.09765
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in silicon: a review
similarity 0.86Monika Moun & Goutam Sheet · 2021 · arXiv:2108.03031
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possible two-gap superconductivity in NdFeAs(O,F) probed by point-contact Andreev-reflection spectroscopy
similarity 0.86P. Samuely et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0806.1672
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection at the edge of a two-dimensional electron system with strong spin-orbit coupling
similarity 0.86A. Kononov et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1305.5685
Source status unknown — claims are unverified