← Back to search

Fermi-Surface Instabilities in the Heavy-Fermion Superconductor UTe2

Qun Niu, Georg Knebel, Daniel Braithwaite, Dai Aoki, Gérard Lapertot, Gabriel Seyfarth, Jean-Pascal Brison, Jacques Flouquet, Alexandre Pourret

arXiv:1907.11118 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.086601 · 2019-07-25 · Physical review letters

T1experimental25 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We present different transport measurements up to fields of 29~T in the recently discovered heavy-fermion superconductor UTe$_{2}$ with magnetic field $H$ applied along the easy magnetization a-axis of the body-centered orthorhombic structure. The thermoelectric power varies linearly with temperature above the superconducting transition, $T_{SC}= 1.5$ K, indicating that superconductivity develops in a Fermi liquid regime. As a function of field the thermolelectric power shows successive anomalies which are attributed to field-induced Fermi surface instabilities. These Fermi-surface instabilities appear at critical values of the magnetic polarization. Remarkably, the lowest magnetic field instability for $H\parallel a$ occurs for the same critical value of the magnetization (0.4 $μ_B$) than the first order metamagnetic transition at 35~T for field applied along the $b$-axis. The estimated number of charge carriers at low temperature reveals a metallic ground state distinct from LDA calculations indicating that strong electronic correlations are a major issue in this compound.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
UTe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.5Pressure not reportedonset
UTe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.6Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers