Thermodynamic inconsistency of the conventional theory of superconductivity
J. E. Hirsch
arXiv:1907.11273 · DOI 10.1142/S0217979220501751 · 2019-07-25 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A type I superconductor expels a magnetic field from its interior to a surface layer of thickness $λ_L$, the London penetration depth. $λ_L$ is a function of temperature, becoming smaller as the temperature decreases. Here we analyze the process of cooling (or heating) a type I superconductor in a magnetic field, with the system remaining always in the superconducting state. The conventional theory predicts that Joule heat is generated in this process, the amount of which depends on the rate at which the temperature changes. Assuming the final state of the superconductor is independent of history, as the conventional theory assumes, we show that this process violates the first and second laws of thermodynamics. We conclude that the conventional theory of superconductivity is internally inconsistent. Instead, we suggest that the alternative theory of hole superconductivity may be able to resolve this problem.
Similar papers
Inconsistency of the conventional theory of superconductivity
similarity 0.90J. E. Hirsch · 2019 · arXiv:1909.12786
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Joule heating in the normal-superconductor phase transition in a magnetic field
similarity 0.90J. E. Hirsch · 2020 · arXiv:2001.07509
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Novel results about magnetic fluctuation effects near the normal-to-superconducting phase transition in a zero magnetic field
similarity 0.89D. V. Shopova & T. P. Todorov · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0306466
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A possible cooling effect in high temperature superconductors
similarity 0.89Anatoly Svidzinsky · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0106177
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nearly Ferromagnetic Superconductors
similarity 0.89Qi Li et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0606090
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Rotating Superconductors and the Frame-independent London Equation
similarity 0.89Mario Liu · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9806300
Source status unknown — claims are unverified