Field-dependent nonlinear surface resistance and its optimization by surface nano-structuring in superconductors
Takayuki Kubo, Alex Gurevich
arXiv:1907.12040 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.064522 · 2019-07-28 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We propose a theory of nonlinear surface resistance of a dirty superconductor in a strong radio-frequency (RF) field, taking into account magnetic and nonmagnetic impurities, finite quasiparticle lifetimes, and a thin proximity-coupled normal layer characteristic of the oxide surface of many materials. The Usadel equations were solved to obtain the quasiparticle density of states (DOS) and the low-frequency surface resistance $R_s$ as functions of the RF field amplitude $H_0$. It is shown that the interplay of the broadening of the DOS peaks and a decrease of a quasiparticle gap caused by the RF currents produces a minimum in $R_s(H_0)$ and an extended rise of the quality factor $Q(H_0)$ with the RF field. Paramagnetic impurities shift the minimum in $R_s(H_0)$ to lower fields and can reduce $R_s(H_0)$ in a wide range of $H_0$. Subgap states in the DOS can give rise to a residual surface resistance while reducing $R_s$ at higher temperatures. A proximity-coupled normal layer at the surface can shift the minimum in $R_s(H_0)$ to either low and high fields and can reduce $R_s$ below that of an ideal surface. The theory shows that the behavior of $R_s(H_0)$ changes as the temperature and the RF frequency are increased, and the field dependence of $Q(H_0)$ can be very sensitive to the materials processing. Our results suggest that the nonlinear RF losses can be minimized by tuning pairbreaking effects at the surface using impurity management or surface nanostructuring.
Similar papers
Field-dependent nonlinear surface resistance and its optimization by surface nanostructuring in superconductors
similarity 0.94Takayuki Kubo & Alex Gurevich
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Domain wall superconductivity in superconductor/ferromagnet bilayers
similarity 0.90M. Houzet & A. I. Buzdin · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0605326
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetism via superconductivity in SF proximity structures
similarity 0.90V. N. Krivoruchko & V. N. Varyukhin · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0506277
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reduction of Dissipative Nonlinear Conductivity of Superconductors by Static and Microwave Magnetic Fields
similarity 0.90A. Gurevich
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-dependent coupling of supercurrent and nonequilibrium quasiparticles in high-field superconductors
similarity 0.90P. Maier & D. Beckmann · 2022 · arXiv:2211.10120
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Radio-frequency electromagnetic field and vortex penetration in multilayered superconductors
similarity 0.90Takayuki Kubo et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1304.6876
Source status unknown — claims are unverified