Doping-dependent competition between superconductivity and polycrystalline charge density waves
Caprara, S., Grilli, M., Lorenzana, J., Leridon, B.
arXiv:1908.03408 · DOI 10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.1.003 · 2020-01-08
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
From systematic analysis of the high pulsed magnetic field resistance data of La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$CuO$_{4}$ thin films, we extract an experimental phase diagram for several doping values ranging from the very underdoped to the very overdoped regimes. Our analysis highlights a competition between charge density waves and superconductivity which is ubiquitous between $x=0.08$ and $x=0.19$ and produces the previously observed double step transition. When suppressed by a strong magnetic field, superconductivity is resilient for two specific doping ranges centered around respectively $x\approx 0.09$ and $x\approx 0.19$ and the characteristic temperature for the onset of the competing charge density wave phase is found to vanish above $x = 0.19$. At $x=1/8$ the two phases are found to coexist exactly at zero magnetic field.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Gap and pseudogap evolution within the charge-ordering scenario for superconducting cuprates
similarity 0.92L. Benfatto et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0002250
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Protected superconductivity at the boundaries of charge-density-wave domains
similarity 0.91B. Leridon et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1905.05606
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional density waves and superconductivities in Fe-based superconductors and other strongly correlated electron systems
similarity 0.91Hiroshi Kontani et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2209.00539
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Low-Temperature Pseudogap Phenomenon: Precursor of High- Superconductivity
similarity 0.90Yao Ma et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1311.3395
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High Temperature Superconductivity: Ineluctable Complexity
similarity 0.90Eduardo Fradkin & Steven A. Kivelson · 2013 · arXiv:1307.6269
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Double criticality in the magnetic field-driven transition of a high-TC superconductor
similarity 0.90Brigitte Leridon et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1306.4583
Source status unknown — claims are unverified