Magnetization Current Simulation of High Temperature Bulk Superconductors Using A-V-A Formulation and Iterative Algorithm Method: Critical State Model and Flux Creep Model
Kai Zhang, Sebastian Hellmann, Marco Calvi, Thomas Schmidt, Lucas Brouwer
arXiv:1908.04640 · 2019-08-13 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In this work we will introduce the A-V-A formulation based iterative algorithm method (IAM) for simulating the magnetization current of high temperature superconductors. This new method embedded in ANSYS can simulate the critical state model by forcing the trapped current density to the critical current density Jc for all meshed superconducting elements after each iterative load step, as well as simulate the flux creep model by updating the E-J power law based resistivity values. The simulation results of a disk-shaped ReBCO bulk during zero field cooling (ZFC) or field cooling (FC) magnetization agree well with the simulation results from using the H-formulation in COMSOL. The computation time is shortened by using the A-V formulation in superconductor areas and the A-formulation in non-superconductor areas. This iterative method is further proved friendly for adding ferromagnetic materials into the FEA model or taking into account the magnetic field-dependent or mechanical strain-related critical current density of the superconductors. The influence factors for the magnetization simulation, including the specified iterative load steps, the initial resistivity, the ramping time and the updating coefficient, are discussed in detail. The A-V-A formulation based IAM, implemented in ANSYS, shows its unique advantages in adjustable computation time, multi-frame restart analysis and easy-convergence.
Similar papers
Fast and efficient critical state modelling of field-cooled bulk high-temperature superconductors using a backward computation method
similarity 0.86Kai Zhang et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2007.06385
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comparison of 2D simulation models to estimate the critical current of a coated superconducting coil
similarity 0.86Yingzhen Liu et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1807.10352
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electromagnetic Modeling of Superconductors with Commercial Software: Possibilities with Two Vector Potential-Based Formulations
similarity 0.85Francesco Grilli et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2004.01913
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Implementation of the H- formulation in COMSOL Multiphysics for simulating the magnetization of bulk superconductors and comparison with the H-formulation
similarity 0.84Alexandre Arsenault et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2006.13784
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Modeling of screening currents in coated conductor magnets containing up to 40000 turns
similarity 0.83Enric Pardo · 2016 · arXiv:1602.05433
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hermite-Chebyshev pseudospectral method for inhomogeneous superconducting strip problems and magnetic flux pump modeling
similarity 0.82Vladimir Sokolovsky & Leonid Prigozhin · 2021 · arXiv:2108.10654
Source status unknown — claims are unverified