Orbital transmutation and the electronic spectrum of FeSe in the nematic phase
Morten H. Christensen, Rafael M. Fernandes, Andrey V. Chubukov
arXiv:1908.04889 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013015 · 2019-08-13 · Physical Review Research
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We consider the electronic spectrum near $M=(π,π)$ in the nematic phase of FeSe ($T<T_{\rm nem}$) and make a detailed comparison with recent ARPES and STM experiments. Our main focus is the unexpected temperature dependence of the excitations at the $M$ point. These have been identified as having $xz$ and $yz$ orbital character well below $T_{\rm nem}$, but remain split at $T>T_{\rm nem}$, in apparent contradiction to the fact that in the tetragonal phase the $xz$ and $yz$ orbitals are degenerate. Here we present two scenarios which can describe the data. In both scenarios, hybridization terms present in the tetragonal phase leads to an orbital transmutation, a change in the dominant orbital character of some of the bands, between $T > T_{\rm nem}$ and $T \ll T_{\rm nem}$. The first scenario relies on the spin-orbit coupling at the $M$ point. We show that a finite spin-orbit coupling gives rise to orbital transmutation, in which one of the modes, identified as $xz$ ($yz)$ at $T \ll T_{\rm nem}$, becomes predominantly $xy$ at $T > T_{\rm nem}$ and hence does not merge with the predominantly $yz$ ($xz$) mode. The second scenario, complementary to the first, takes into consideration the fact that both ARPES and STM are surface probes. In the bulk, a direct hybridization between the $xz$ and $yz$ orbitals is not allowed at the $M$ point, however, it is permitted on the surface. In the presence of a direct $xz/yz$ hybridization, the orbital character of the $xz/yz$ modes changes from pure $xz$ and pure $yz$ at $T \ll T_{\rm nem}$ to $xz \pm yz$ at $T > T_{\rm nem}$, i.e., the two modes again have mono-orbital character at low $T$, but do not merge at $T_{\rm nem}$. We discuss how these scenarios can be distinguished in polarized ARPES experiments.
Similar papers
Interplay of nematic and magnetic orders in FeSe under pressure
similarity 0.94Daniel D. Scherer et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1612.06085
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nematic orders and nematicity-driven topological phase transition in FeSe
similarity 0.93Xianxin Wu et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1603.02055
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Distinct pressure evolution of coupled nematic and magnetic order in FeSe
similarity 0.93Anna E. Böhmer et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1803.09449
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting gap structure of FeSe
similarity 0.93Lin Jiao et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1605.01908
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Itinerant approach to magnetic neutron scattering of FeSe: effect of orbital selectivity
similarity 0.93Andreas Kreisel et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1807.09482
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Synergy and competition between superconductivity and antiferromagnetism in FeSe under pressure
similarity 0.92Guan-Yu Chen et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1811.11599
Source status unknown — claims are unverified