Ground State Wave Function Overlap in Superconductors and Superfluids
Mark P. Hertzberg, Mudit Jain
arXiv:1908.04892 · DOI 10.1515/zna-2020-0277 · 2019-08-14 · Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In order to elucidate the quantum ground state structure of non-relativistic condensates, we explicitly construct the ground state wave function for multiple species of bosons, describing either superconductivity or superfluidity. Since each field $Ψ_j$ carries a phase $θ_j$ and the Lagrangian is invariant under rotations $θ_j \to θ_j + α_j$ for independent $α_j$, one can investigate the corresponding wave function overlap between a pair of ground states $\langle G|G'\rangle$ differing by these phases. We operate in the infinite volume limit and use a particular prescription to define these states by utilizing the position space kernel and regulating the UV modes. We show that this overlap vanishes for most pairs of rotations, including $θ_j \to θ_j + m_j ε$, where $m_j$ is the mass of each species, while it is unchanged under the transformation $θ_j \to θ_j + q_j ε$, where $q_j$ is the charge of each species. We explain that this is consistent with the distinction between a superfluid, in which there is a non-trivial conserved number, and the superconductor, in which the electric field and conserved charge is screened, while it is compatible with a non-zero order parameter in both cases. Moreover, we find that this bulk ground state wave function overlap directly reflects the Goldstone boson structure of the effective theory and provides a useful diagnostic of its physical phase.
Similar papers
A theory about high-temperature superconductivity
similarity 0.89P. Brovetto & V. Maxia · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0502244
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Screening and Topological Order in Thin Superconducting Films
similarity 0.88E. C. Marino et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1706.01310
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity, Broken Gauge Symmetry, and the Higgs Mechanism
similarity 0.88Nicholas R. Poniatowski · 2019 · arXiv:1905.07786
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and Electric Fields: A Relativistic Extension of BCS Superconductivity
similarity 0.88Govaerts, Jan & Bertrand, Damien · 2017 · arXiv:cond-mat/0608084
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fluctuation Phenomena in Superconductors
similarity 0.88A. I. Larkin & A. A. Varlamov · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0109177
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Collective modes in superconductors including Coulomb repulsion
similarity 0.88Joshua Althüser & Götz S. Uhrig · 2025 · arXiv:2503.05494
Source status unknown — claims are unverified