Similarities and differences between infinite-layer nickelates and cuprates and implications for superconductivity

Botana, Antia S.; Norman, Michael R.

doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.10.011024

← Back to search

Similarities and differences between infinite-layer nickelates and cuprates and implications for superconductivity

Botana, Antia S., Norman, Michael R.

arXiv:1908.10946 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.011024 · 2020-02-05

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We have revisited the electronic structure of infinite-layer RNiO$_2$ (R= La, Nd) in light of the recent discovery of superconductivity in Sr-doped NdNiO$_2$. From a comparison to their cuprate counterpart CaCuO$_2$, we derive essential facts related to their electronic structures, in particular the values for various hopping parameters and energy splittings, and the influence of the spacer cation. From this detailed comparison, we comment on expectations in regards to superconductivity. In particular, both materials exhibit a large ratio of longer-range hopping to near-neighbor hopping which should be conducive for superconductivity.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

Formula	Reported Tc (K)	Pressure (GPa)	Type
CaCuO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	110	Pressure not reported	unknown