Fluctuations and pairing in Fe-based superconductors: Light scattering experiments
N Lazarevic, R Hackl
arXiv:1909.00173 · DOI 10.1088/1361-648X/ab8849 · 2019-08-31 · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Inelastic scattering of visible light (Raman effect) offers a window into properties of correlated metals such as spin, electron and lattice dynamics as well as their mutual interactions. In this review we focus on electronic and spin excitations in Fe-based pnictides and chalcogenides in particular, but not exclusively superconductors. After a general introduction to the basic theory including the selection rules for the various scattering processes we provide an overview over the major results. In the superconducting state below the transition temperature Tc the pair-breaking effect can be observed, and the energy gap can be derived. The energies can be associated with the gaps and their anisotropy on the electron and hole bands. In spite of the similarities of the overall band structures the results are strongly dependent on the family and may even change qualitatively within one family. In some of the compounds strong collective modes appear below Tc. In Ba1-xKxFe2As2, which has the most isotropic gap of all Fe-based superconductors, there are indications that these modes are exciton-like states appearing in the presence of a hierarchy of pairing tendencies. The strong in-gap modes observed in Co-doped NaFeAs are interpreted in terms of quadrupolar orbital excitations which become undamped in the superconducting state. The doping dependence of the scattering intensity in Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2 is associated with a nematic resonance above a quantum critical point and interpreted in terms of a critical enhancement at the maximal Tc. In the normal state the response from particle-hole excitations reflects the resistivity. In addition, there are contributions from presumably critical fluctuations in the energy range of kBT which can be compared to the elastic properties. Currently it is not settled whether the fluctuations observed by light scattering are related to spin or charge.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ba1-xKxFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NaFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| K0.75Fe1.75Se2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Band and momentum dependent electron dynamics in superconducting as seen via electronic Raman scattering
similarity 0.90B. Muschler et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0910.0898
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic pairing fingerprint of the iron-based superconductor
similarity 0.90Thomas Böhm et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1703.07749
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phenomenological description of the two energy scales in underdoped superconducting cuprates
similarity 0.89B. Valenzuela & E. Bascones · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0611154
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution of Magnetic and Superconducting Fluctuations with Doping of High-Tc Superconductors (An electronic Raman scattering study)
similarity 0.89G. Blumberg et al. · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9711073
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping evolution of the gap structure and spin-fluctuation pairing in superconductors
similarity 0.89A. E. Karakozov et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1812.10118
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Competing d and s Pairing Symmetries in Superconducting LaNiO emerge from LDA+FLEX Calculations
similarity 0.89Griffin Heier et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2312.04401
Source status unknown — claims are unverified