Pairing in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model from Weak to Strong Coupling
Astrid T. Rømer, Thomas A. Maier, Andreas Kreisel, Ilya Eremin, P. J. Hirschfeld, Brian M. Andersen
arXiv:1909.00627 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013108 · 2019-09-02 · Physical Review Research
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The Hubbard model is the simplest model that is believed to exhibit superconductivity arising from purely repulsive interactions, and has been extensively applied to explore a variety of unconventional superconducting systems. Here we study the evolution of the leading superconducting instabilities of the single-orbital Hubbard model on a two-dimensional square lattice as a function of onsite Coulomb repulsion $U$ and band filling by calculating the irreducible particle-particle scattering vertex obtained from dynamical cluster approximation (DCA) calculations, and compare the results to both perturbative Kohn-Luttinger (KL) theory as well as the widely used random phase approximation (RPA) spin-fluctuation pairing scheme. Near half-filling we find remarkable agreement of the hierarchy of the leading pairing states between these three methods, implying adiabatic continuity between weak- and strong-coupling pairing solutions of the Hubbard model. The $d_{x^2-y^2}$-wave instability is robust to increasing $U$ near half-filling as expected. Away from half filling, the predictions of KL and RPA at small $U$ for transitions to other pair states agree with DCA at intermediate $U$ as well as recent diagrammatic Monte Carlo calculations. RPA results fail only in the very dilute limit, where it yields a $d_{xy}$ ground state instead of a $p$-wave state established by diagrammatic Monte Carlo and low-order perturbative methods, as well as our DCA calculations. We discuss the origins of this discrepancy, highlighting the crucial role of the vertex corrections neglected in the RPA approach. Overall, comparison of the various methods over the entire phase diagram strongly suggests a smooth crossover of the superconducting interaction generated by local Hubbard interactions between weak and strong coupling.
Similar papers
Effective pairing interaction in the two-dimensional Hubbard model within a spin rotationally invariant approach
similarity 0.92V. A. Apinyan & T. K. Kopec · 2008 · arXiv:0812.1461
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Revisiting superconductivity in the extended one-band Hubbard model: Pairing via spin and charge fluctuations
similarity 0.92Mercè Roig et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possible Cooper instabilities in pair Green functions of the two-dimensional Hubbard model
similarity 0.91André LeClair · 2011 · arXiv:1107.5272
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Validity of the spin-susceptibility "glue" approximation for pairing in the two-dimensional Hubbard model
similarity 0.91Khatami, E. et al. · 2010 · arXiv:0901.4802
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity-driven ferromagnetism and superconductivity in the triangular Rashba-Hubbard model
similarity 0.91Mehdi Biderang et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2111.08931
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Binding of holes and competing spin-charge order in simple and extended Hubbard model on cylindrical lattice: An exact diagonalization study
similarity 0.91Md Fahad Equbal & M. A. H. Ahsan · 2025 · arXiv:2512.10577
Source status unknown — claims are unverified