Theory of time-resolved optical conductivity of superconductors:comparing two methods for its evaluation
John P. Revelle, Ankit Kumar, Alexander F. Kemper
arXiv:1909.04669 · DOI 10.3390/condmat4030079 · 2019-09-10 · Condensed Matter
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Time-resolved optical conductivity is an oft-used tool to interrogate quantum materials driven out of equilibrium. Theoretically calculating this observable is a complex topic with several approaches discussed in the literature. Using a non-equilibrium Keldysh formalism and a functional derivative approach to the conductivity, we present a comparison of two particular approaches to the calculation of the optical conductivity, and their distinguishing features, as applied to a pumped superconductor. The two methods are distinguished by the relative motion of the probe and gate times; either the probe or gate time is kept fixed while the other is swept. We find that both the methods result in same qualitative features of the time-resolved conductivity after pump is over. However, calculating the conductivity by keeping the gate fixed removes artifacts inherent to the other method. We provide software that, based on data for the first method, is able to construct the second approach.
Similar papers
Higgs Oscillations in time-resolved Optical Conductivity
similarity 0.90A. Kumar & A. F. Kemper · 2019 · arXiv:1902.09549
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of time-resolved spectral function in high-temperature superconductors with bosonic modes
similarity 0.88Jianmin Tao & Jian-Xin Zhu · 2010 · arXiv:1001.0573
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Non-collinear order and gapless superconductivity in s-wave magnetic superconductors
similarity 0.88Karmakar, Madhuparna & Majumdar, Pinaki · 2016 · arXiv:1601.05730
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cavity quantum-electrodynamical polaritonically enhanced electron-phonon coupling and its influence on superconductivity
similarity 0.88Michael A. Sentef et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1802.09437
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quench-drive spectroscopy of cuprates
similarity 0.87Matteo Puviani & Dirk Manske · 2022 · arXiv:2203.01242
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Non-equilibrium dynamics across the BEC-BCS crossover
similarity 0.87G. Seibold & J. Lorenzana · 2020 · arXiv:2004.02454
Source status unknown — claims are unverified