← Back to search

Helical structures in layered magnetic superconductors due to indirect exchange interactions mediated by interlayer tunneling

A. E. Koshelev

arXiv:1910.01609 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.224503 · 2019-10-03

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Motivated by the recent discovery of helical magnetic structure in RbEuFe$_{4}$As$_{4}$, we investigate interlayer ordering of magnetic moments in materials composed of spatially-separated superconducting and ferromagnetically-aligned layers. We consider the interplay between the normal and superconducting indirect exchange interaction mediated by tunneling between the conducting layers. We elaborate a recipe to evaluate the normal interlayer interaction via two-dimensional density of states of an isolated layer and demonstrate that for bands with small fillings, such interaction is typically ferromagnetic and short-range. The nearest-layer interaction is proportional to the ratio of the interlayer hopping and in-plane band width squared. On the other hand, the superconducting contribution always gives antiferromagnetic interaction and may extend over several layers when the interlayer hopping energy exceeds the superconducting gap. The frustration caused by the interplay between the normal and superconducting parts may lead to spiral ground-state magnetic configuration. The four-fold in-plane anisotropy may lock the rotation angle between the moments in the neighboring layers to $90^\circ$, as it was observed in RbEuFe$_{4}$As$_{4}$

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
ErRh4B4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

8.5Pressure not reportedunknown
Ho1.2Mo6S8

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.2Pressure not reportedunknown
UGe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
URhGe

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
UCoGe

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
EuFe2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

302.6 GPaunknown
EuFe2(As1-xPx)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

26Pressure not reportedunknown
RbEuFe4As4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

36.5Pressure not reportedunknown
CsEuFe4As4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

36.5Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers