Generalized Spin Fluctuation Feedback In Correlated Fermion Superconductors
Adil Amin, D. F. Agterberg
arXiv:1910.10780 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013381 · 2019-10-23 · Physical Review Research
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Experiments reveal that the superconductors $\text{UPt}_3$, $\text{U}_{1-x}\text{Th}_x\text{Be}_{13}$ and $\text{PrOs}_4\text{Sb}_{12}$ undergo two superconducting transitions in the absence of an applied magnetic field. The prevalence of these multiple transitions suggests a common underlying mechanism. A natural candidate theory which accounts for these two transitions is the existence of a small symmetry breaking field, however such a field has not been observed in $\text{PrOs}_4\text{Sb}_{12}$ or $\text{U}_{1-x}\text{Th}_x\text{Be}_{13}$ and has been called into question for $\text{UPt}_3$. Motivated by arguments originally developed for superfluid $^3\text{He}$ we propose that a generalized spin fluctuation feedback effect is responsible for these two transitions. We first develop a phenomenological theory for $^3\text{He}$ that couples spin fluctuations to superfluidity, which correctly predicts that a high temperature broken time-reversal superfluid $^3\text{He}$ phase can emerge as a consequence. The transition at lower temperatures into a time-reversal invariant superfluid phase must then be first order by symmetry arguments. We then apply this phenomenological approach to the three superconductors $\text{UPt}_3$, $\text{U}_{1-x}\text{Th}_x\text{Be}_{13}$ and $\text{PrOs}_4\text{Sb}_{12}$ revealing that this naturally leads to a high-temperature time-reversal invariant nematic superconducting phase, which can be followed by a second order phase transition into a broken time-reversal symmetry phase, as observed.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPt3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.53 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| UPt3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.48 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
Similar papers
Interplay of paramagnetic, orbital and impurity effects on the phase transition of a normal metal to superconducting state
similarity 0.90M. Houzet & V. P. Mineev · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0606799
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Current-driven motion of magnetic topological defects in ferromagnetic superconductors
similarity 0.89Se Kwon Kim & Suk Bum Chung · 2023 · arXiv:2305.13564
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic properties of superconductors with strong spin-orbit coupling
similarity 0.89K. V. Samokhin · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0404407
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Free Energy of Non-uniform Disordered Superconductors
similarity 0.89Matthias Eschrig & Anton B. Vorontsov · 2026 · arXiv:2608.19573
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Controllable enhancement of -wave superconductivity via magnetic coupling to a conventional superconductor
similarity 0.89Linde A. B. Olde Olthof et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.10263
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Exact Solution of a Repulsive Fermi Model With Enhanced Superconducting Correlations
similarity 0.89H. R. Krishnamurthy et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0004136
Source status unknown — claims are unverified