Achieving the depairing limit along $c$ axis in Fe$_{1+y}$Te$_{1-x}$Se$_x$ single crystals
Yue Sun, Haruka Ohnuma, Shin-ya Ayukawa, Takashi Noji, Yoji Koike, Tsuyoshi Tamegai, Haruhisa Kitano
arXiv:1911.00727 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.134516 · 2019-11-02 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report the achieving of depairing current limit along $c$-axis in Fe$_{1+y}$Te$_{1-x}$Se$_x$ single crystals. A series of crystals with $T_{\rm{c}}$ ranging from 8.6 K to 13.7 K (different amount of excess Fe, $y$) were fabricated into $c$-axis bridges with a square-micrometer cross-section. The critical current density, $J_{\rm{c}}$, was directly estimated from the transport current-voltage measurements. The transport $J_{\rm{c}}$ reaches a very large value, which is about one order of magnitude larger than the depinning $J_{\rm{c}}$, but comparable to the calculated depairing $J_{\rm{c}}$ $\sim$ 2 $\times$ 10$^6$ A/cm$^2$ at 0 K, based on the Ginzburg-Landau (GL) theory. The temperature dependence of the depairing $J_{\rm{c}}$ follows the GL-theory ($\propto$ (1-$T/T_{\rm{c}}$)$^{3/2}$) down to $\sim$ 0.83 $T_{\rm{c}}$, then increases with a reduced slope at low temperatures, which can be qualitatively described by the Kupriyanov-Lukichev theory. Our study provides a new route to understand the behavior of depairing $J_{\rm{c}}$ in iron-based superconductors in a wide temperature range.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fe1+yTe1-xSex Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8.6 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Fe1+yTe1-xSex Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8.8 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Fe1+yTe1-xSex Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.3 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Fe1+yTe1-xSex Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.5 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Fe1+yTe1-xSex Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 10.9 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Fe1+yTe1-xSex Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 11.9 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Fe1+yTe1-xSex Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12.8 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Fe1+yTe1-xSex Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 13.7 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 37 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 40 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 65 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Suppression of phase separation and giant enhancement of superconducting transition temperature in FeSeTe thin films
similarity 0.91Yoshinori Imai et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1502.00758
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Isotropic superconducting state and high critical currents in Fe1+yTe1-xSx single crystals
similarity 0.91Rongwei Hu et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0903.4430
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fabrication of FeSe1-x superconducting films with bulk properties
similarity 0.90Soon-Gil Jung et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1005.0192
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Staggered FeSe Monolayer on SrTiO (110) surface
similarity 0.90Xianxin Wu et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1601.04016
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The pseudogap behavior in the stoichiometric FeSe superconductor (Tc~9.4 K)
similarity 0.89Yoo Jang Song et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0911.2045
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution from incoherent to coherent electronic states and its implications to superconductivity in FeTe1-xSex
similarity 0.89E. Ieki et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1405.1172
Source status unknown — claims are unverified