Superconducting Contact and Quantum Interference Between Two-Dimensional van der Waals and Three-Dimensional Conventional Superconductors
Michael R. Sinko, Sergio C. de la Barrera, Olivia Lanes, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Susheng Tan, David Pekker, Michael Hatridge, Benjamin M. Hunt
arXiv:1911.09711 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.014001 · 2019-11-21
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Two-dimensional (2D) transition-metal dichalcogenide superconductors have unique and desirable properties for integration with conventional superconducting circuits. However, fully superconducting contact must be made between the 2D material and three-dimensional (3D) superconductors in order to employ the standard microwave drive and readout of qubits in such circuits. Here, we present a method for creating zero-resistance contacts between 2D NbSe$_2$ and 3D aluminum that behave as Josephson junctions (JJs) with large effective areas compared to 3D-3D JJs. We present a model for the supercurrent flow in a 2D-3D superconducting structure by numerical solution of the Ginzburg-Landau equations and find good agreement with experiment. These results demonstrate a crucial step towards a new generation of hybrid superconducting quantum circuits.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6.5 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.2 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
Similar papers
Superconducting contact and quantum interference between two-dimensional van der Waals and three-dimensional conventional superconductors
similarity 0.92Michael R. Sinko et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Quantum Interference in Twisted van der Waals Heterostructures
similarity 0.89Liam S. Farrar et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2101.04557
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of Topological Edge States on the Properties of Al/Bi2Se3/Al Hybrid Josephson Devices
similarity 0.88L. Galletti et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1406.0703
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Building 3D superconductor-based Josephson junctions using a via transfer approach
similarity 0.87Cequn Li et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2511.17386
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Signature of long-ranged spin triplets across a two-dimensional superconductor/helimagnet van der Waals interface
similarity 0.87A. Spuri et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A hybrid ferromagnetic transmon qubit: circuit design, feasibility and detection protocols for magnetic fluctuations
similarity 0.87Halima Giovanna Ahmad et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2206.00715
Source status unknown — claims are unverified