On the Origin of Superconductivity at Nickel-Bismuth Interfaces
Matthew Vaughan, Nathan Satchell, Mannan Ali, Christy J. Kinane, Gavin B. G. Stenning, Sean Langridge, Gavin Burnell
arXiv:1911.10427 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013270 · 2019-11-23 · Physical Review Research
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Unconventional superconductivity has been suggested to be present at the interface between bismuth and nickel in thin-film bilayers. In this work, we study the structural, magnetic and superconducting properties of sputter deposited Bi/Ni bilayers. As-grown, our films do not display a superconducting transition, however, when stored at room temperature, after about 14 days our bilayers develop a superconducting transition up to 3.8 K. To systematically study the effect of low temperature annealing on our bilayers, we perform structural characterization with X-ray diffraction and polarized neutron reflectometry, along with magnetometry and low temperature electrical transport measurements on samples annealed at $70\,^\circ$C. We show that the onset of superconductivity in our samples is coincident with the formation of ordered NiBi$_3$ intermetallic alloy, a known $s$-wave superconductor. We calculate that the annealing process has an activation energy of $(0.86\pm 0.06)$eV. As a consequence, gentle heating of the bilayers will cause formation of the superconducting NiBi$_3$ at the Ni/Bi interface, which poses a challenge to studying any distinct properties of Bi/Ni bilayers without degrading that interface.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NiBi3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.8 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| NiBi3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.8 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Bi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.0005 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NiBi3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity Above H_{c2} as a Probe for Niobium RF-Cavity Surfaces
similarity 0.91Sara Casalbuoni et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0310565
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for fully-gapped superconductivity in BCS superconductor NiBi3
similarity 0.90Atul Gangwar et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2607.20974
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Origin of superconductivity at nickel-bismuth interfaces
similarity 0.90Matthew Vaughan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coexistence of Ferromagnetism and Superconductivity in Ni/Bi Bilayers
similarity 0.90P. LeClair et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional interfacial superconductivity in epitaxial Bi/Ni heterostructures
similarity 0.89Xin-Xin Gong et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1504.04232
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Bismuth Phase Dependent Growth of Superconducting NiBi3 Nanorods
similarity 0.89Laxmipriya Nanda et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2306.12034
Source status unknown — claims are unverified