Upper critical field and superconductor-metal transition in ultrathin niobium films
I. Zaytseva, A. Abaloszew, B. C. Camargo, Y. Syryanyy, Marta Z. Cieplak
arXiv:1912.03080 · DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-75968-9 · 2019-12-06
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recent studies suggests that in disordered ultrathin films superconducting (SC) state may be intrinsically inhomogeneous. Here we investigate the nature of SC state in ultrathin Nb films, of thickness $d$ ranging from 1.2 nm to 20 nm, which undergo a transition from amorphous to polycrystalline structure at the thickness $d \simeq 3.3$ nm. We show that the properties of SC state are very different in polycrystalline and amorphous films. The upper critical field ($H_{c2}$) is orbitally limited in the first case, and paramagnetically limited in the latter. The magnetic field induced superconductor-metal transition is observed, with the critical field approximately constant or decreasing as a power-law with the film conductance in polycrystalline or amorphous films, respectively. The scaling analysis indicates distinct scaling exponents in these two types of films. Negative contribution of the SC fluctuations to conductivity exists above $H_{c2}$, particularly pronounced in amorphous films, signaling the presence of fluctuating Cooper pairs. These observations suggest the development of local inhomogeneities in the amorphous films, in the form of proximity-coupled SC islands. An usual evolution of SC correlations on cooling is observed in amorphous films, likely related to the effect of quantum fluctuations on the proximity-induced phase coherence.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.35 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.8 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.3 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.86 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.5 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.19 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.78 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.63 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.28 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.38 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.13 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.29 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.99 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.67 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.39 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.14 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.62 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.75 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5.22 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5.43 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5.75 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6.31 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6.48 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6.16 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6.29 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7.49 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7.6 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7.6 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7.7 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Effect of metal encapsulation on bulk superconducting properties of niobium thin films used in qubits
similarity 0.89Amlan Datta et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2602.07617
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for Multiband Superconductivity in 2H-NbSeS
similarity 0.89K. Yadav et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2606.19107
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Substrate induced proximity effect in superconducting niobium nanofilms
similarity 0.89S. J. Rezvani et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1810.12643
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamic fluctuations in the superconductivity of NbN films from microwave conductivity measurements
similarity 0.89Takeyoshi Ohashi et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0605179
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A quantitative description of Nernst effect in high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.89Rong Li & Zhen-Su She · 2017 · arXiv:1701.01832
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Surface superconductivity as the primary cause of broadening of superconducting transition in Nb-films
similarity 0.89A. Zeinali & V. M. Krasnov · 2016 · arXiv:1609.03434
Source status unknown — claims are unverified