Interaction Between Two Single Superconducting Vortices Inside A Superconducting Hollow Cylindrical domain
Diego García Ovalle, Enrique Muñoz, Rafael D. Benguria
arXiv:1912.03419 · 2019-12-07
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Inspired by the seminal, ground-breaking work of Abrikosov in 1957, we developed a new approximation to the interaction between two widely separated superconducting vortices. In contrast with Abrikosov's, we take into account the finite size of the vortices and their internal magnetic profile. We consider the vortices to be embedded within a superconducting, infinitely long hollow cylinder, in order to simplify the symmetry and boundary conditions for the mathematical analysis. We study this system in the context of a magnetic Ginzburg-Landau functional theory, by solving for the magnetic field profile inside each vortex, as well as in the superconducting region, subject to physical boundary conditions inspired by the classical analogue of two mutually inducting coils. Under isothermal conditions, the effective force between these vortices is given by the gradient of the Helmholtz free energy constructed from the Ginzburg-Landau functional. From our results, we explicitly show that, in agreement with well established theoretical arguments and experiments, the interaction between widely separated vortices is repulsive in this context, and their equilibrium positions are constrained by the fluxoid's conservation. Moreover, we find that the equilibrium positions of the vortices centers are stable due to the convexity of the Helmholtz free energy profile. Remarkably, the effect of the boundaries of the region over the effective interaction between the vortices is important in the chosen geometric configuration.
Similar papers
Vortex lattice structure in a d_{x^2-y^2}-wave superconductor
similarity 0.89Masanori Ichioka et al. · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9704147
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the existence of nematic-superconducting states in the Ginzburg-Landau regime
similarity 0.89Mariano De Leo et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2401.13106
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase transitions in the domain structure of ferromagnetic superconductors
similarity 0.89I. M. Khaymovich et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1401.2806
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Elasticity-driven interaction between vortices in type-II superconductors
similarity 0.89A. Cano et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0303342
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Elasticity and melting of vortex crystals in anisotropic superconductors: Beyond the continuum regime
similarity 0.89M. -Carmen Miguel & Mehran Kardar · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9908041
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermodynamics and magnetic field profiles in low-kappa type-II superconductors
similarity 0.89P. Miranovic & K. Machida · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0209660
Source status unknown — claims are unverified