Relating Andreev Bound States and Supercurrents in Hybrid Josephson Junctions
F. Nichele, E. Portolés, A. Fornieri, A. M. Whiticar, A. C. C. Drachmann, T. Wang, G. C. Gardner, C. Thomas, A. T. Hatke, M. J. Manfra, C. M. Marcus
arXiv:1912.08893 · DOI 10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.124.226801 · 2019-12-18 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate superconducting quantum interference devices consisting of two highly transmissive Josephson junctions coupled by a superconducting loop, all defined in an epitaxial InAs/Al heterostructure. A novel device design allows for independent measurements of the Andreev bound state spectrum within the normal region of a junction and the resulting current-phase relation. We show that knowledge of the Andreev bound state spectrum alone is enough to derive the independently measured phase dependent supercurrent. On the other hand, the opposite relation does not generally hold true as details of the energy spectrum are averaged out in a critical current measurement. Finally, quantitative understanding of field dependent spectrum and supercurrent require taking into account the second junction in the loop and the kinetic inductance of the epitaxial Al film.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Helical Andreev bound states and superconducting Klein tunneling in topological insulator Josephson junctions
similarity 0.89G. Tkachov & E. M. Hankiewicz
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution of -periodic Supercurrent in the Presence of In-plane Magnetic Field
similarity 0.89Bassel Heiba Elfeky et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.06502
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Current-phase relations of InAs nanowire Josephson junctions: from interacting to multi-mode regimes
similarity 0.89Sean Hart et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1902.07804
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev spectrum of a Josephson junction with spin-split superconductors
similarity 0.88B. Bujnowski et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1607.07772
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Supercurrent from the imaginary part of the Andreev levels in non-Hermitian Josephson junctions
similarity 0.88Roberto Capecelatro et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.24745
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of magnetic pair breaking on Andreev bound states and resonant supercurrent in quantum dot Josephson junctions
similarity 0.88Grygoriy Tkachov & Klaus Richter · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0609179
Source status unknown — claims are unverified