← Back to search

Strong- to weak-coupling superconductivity in high-$T_c$ bismuthates: revisiting the phase diagram via $μ$SR

T. Shang, D. J. Gawryluk, M. Naamneh, Z. Salman, Z. Guguchia, M. Medarde, M. Shi, N. C. Plumb, T. Shiroka

arXiv:1912.12112 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.014508 · 2019-12-27 · Physical Review B

T1experimental3 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Several decades after the discovery of superconductivity in bismuthates, the strength of their electron-phonon coupling and its evolution with doping remain puzzling. To clarify these issues, polycrystalline hole-doped Ba$_{1-x}$K$_{x}$BiO$_3$ ($0.1 \le x \le 0.6$) samples were systematically synthesized and their bulk- and microscopic superconducting properties were investigated by means of magnetic susceptibility and muon-spin rotation/relaxation ($μ$SR), respectively. The phase diagram of Ba$_{1-x}$K$_{x}$BiO$_3$ was reliably extended up to $x = 0.6$, which is still found to be a bulk superconductor. The lattice parameter $a$ increases linearly with K-content, implying a homogeneous chemical doping. The low-temperature superfluid density, measured via transverse-field (TF)-$μ$SR, indicates an isotropic fully-gapped superconducting state with zero-temperature gaps $Δ_0/k_\mathrm{B}T_c$ = 2.15, 2.10, and 1.75, and magnetic penetration depths $λ_0$ = 219, 184, and 279 nm for $x$ = 0.3, 0.4, and 0.6, respectively. A change in the superconducting gap, from a nearly ideal BCS value (1.76 $k_\mathrm{B}$$T_c$ in the weak coupling case) in the overdoped $x$ = 0.6 region, to much higher values in the optimally-doped case, implies a gradual decrease in electron-phonon coupling with doping.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Ba0.7K0.3BiO3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

29.5Pressure unresolvedonset
Ba0.6K0.4BiO3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

26.5Pressure unresolvedonset
Ba0.4K0.6BiO3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

10.3Pressure unresolvedonset
Ba0.75K0.25BiO3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

25Pressure unresolvedonset
Ba0.7K0.3BiO3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

29.5Pressure unresolvedunknown
Ba0.6K0.4BiO3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

26.5Pressure unresolvedunknown
Ba0.4K0.6BiO3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

10.3Pressure unresolvedunknown
Ba0.63K0.37BiO3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

34Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers