← Back to search

Fundamental difference in the electronic reconstruction of infinite-layer vs. perovskite neodymium nickelate films on SrTiO$_3$(001)

Benjamin Geisler, Rossitza Pentcheva

arXiv:2001.03762 · DOI 10.1103/PHYSREVB.102.020502 · 2020-01-11 · Physical Review B

T344 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Motivated by recent reports of superconductivity in Sr-doped NdNiO$_2$ films on SrTiO$_3$(001) [Nature (London) 572, 624 (2019)], we explore the role of the polar interface on the structural and electronic properties of NdNiO$_n$/SrTiO$_3$(001) ($n=2,3$) by performing first-principles calculations including a Coulomb repulsion term. For infinite-layer nickelate films ($n=2$), electronic reconstruction drives the surprising emergence of a two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) at the interface involving a strong occupation of the Ti $3d$ states. This effect is more pronounced than in LaAlO$_3$/SrTiO$_3$(001) and accompanied by a substantial reconstruction of the Fermi surface: a depletion of the self-doping Nd $5d$ states and an enhanced Ni $e_g$ orbital polarization reaching up to $35\%$ at the surface, reflecting a single hole in the $3d_{x^2-y^2}$ states, i.e., cuprate-like behavior. In contrast, no 2DEG forms for perovskite films ($n=3$) or if a single perovskite layer persists at the interface. We show that the topotactic reaction from the perovskite to the infinite-layer phase is confined to the nickelate film, whereas the SrTiO$_3$ substrate remains intact.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
(Nd,Sr)NiO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers