Split superconducting and time-reversal symmetry-breaking transitions, and magnetic order in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ under uniaxial stress
Vadim Grinenko, Shreenanda Ghosh, Rajib Sarkar, Jean-Christophe Orain, Artem Nikitin, Matthias Elender, Debarchan Das, Zurab Guguchia, Felix Brückner, Mark E. Barber, Joonbum Park, Naoki Kikugawa, Dmitry A. Sokolov, Jake S. Bobowski, Takuto Miyoshi, Yoshiteru Maeno, Andrew P. Mackenzie, Hubertus Luetkens, Clifford W. Hicks, Hans-Henning Klauss
arXiv:2001.08152 · 2020-01-22 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Among unconventional superconductors, Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ has become a benchmark for experimentation and theoretical analysis because its normal-state electronic structure is known with exceptional precision, and because of experimental evidence that its superconductivity has, very unusually, a spontaneous angular momentum, i.e. a chiral state. This hypothesis of chirality is however difficult to reconcile with recent evidence on the spin part of the order parameter. Measurements under uniaxial stress offer an ideal way to test for chirality, because under uniaxial stress the superconducting and chiral transitions are predicted to split, allowing the empirical signatures of each to be identified separately. Here, we report zerofield muon spin relaxation (ZF-$μ$SR) measurements on crystals placed under uniaxial stresses of up to 1.05 GPa. We report a clear stress-induced splitting between the onset temperatures of superconductivity and time-reversal symmetry breaking, consistent with qualitative expectations for chiral superconductivity. We also report the appearance of unexpected bulk magnetic order under a uniaxial stress of ~ 1.0 GPa in clean Sr$_2$RuO$_4$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | onset |
| UPt3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba1-xKxFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pr1-xLaxPt4Ge12 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Recent progress on superconductors with time-reversal symmetry breaking
similarity 0.93Sudeep Kumar Ghosh et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2003.04357
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
SrRuO, like doped cuprates and barium bismuthate, is a negative charge-transfer gap even parity superconductor with -filled oxygen band
similarity 0.93Sumit Mazumdar · 2020 · arXiv:2002.08451
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting order parameter of SrRuO: a microscopic perspective
similarity 0.93Aline Ramires & Manfred Sigrist · 2019 · arXiv:1905.01288
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Majorana zero modes in dislocations of SrRuO
similarity 0.92Taylor L. Hughes et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1303.1539
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
and Pauli limited critical field of : uniaxial strain dependence
similarity 0.91Yue Yu et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2005.09029
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Why Scanning Tunneling Microscopy on SrRuO sometimes doesn't see the superconducting gap
similarity 0.91Adrian Valadkhani et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.13106
Source status unknown — claims are unverified